Dave Glenn: ACC voting on Louisville on 7am conf call **

You guys are completely underestimating the huge impact having a Kentucky footprint would have. Consider this:

1. In 2010 Kentucky had a population of almost 4500000. All of which have at least 1 television and shower

2. The US population is over 300000000 which means Kentucky makes up a percentage of all televisions adding to our monopoly

3. Louisville was ranked as one of the top universities in the state of Kentucky in multiple categories of areas

4. With this addition Notre Dame Texas and Penn State will surely join sources have said

5. Louisville is also a city full of people which stretches the football more bigger

If my calculations are correct (which they are) Louisville could bring in as much as 1 thousand dollars in added revenue per year for the next 100 years. 100 THOUSAND IN REVENUE!

>>tl;dr: we MUST add Louisville to survive

- 12/21/12

You overestimate the number of showers which is roughly equal to the number of teeth. Although it is more than West Virginia. The only good news is that SEC football doesn't exist in Kentucky and they make good bourbon near Louisville, something we'll need to help accept that we're in a conference with them.
 
You overestimate the number of showers which is roughly equal to the number of teeth. Although it is more than West Virginia. The only good news is that SEC football doesn't exist in Kentucky and they make good bourbon near Louisville, something we'll need to help accept that we're in a conference with them.
we could get the bourbon on Bourbon Street and academics too if we had added Tulane. And who wouldn't want a nice easy win in the Big Easy every other year?
 
Do Pitt, Syracuse and Notre Dame vote on this or just current ACC Presidents?
 
Deleted overly pessimistic post.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpE_xMRiCLE

VBtYR.jpg
 
They aren't anything special academically, but they have pretty good basketball, their football has been pretty good the last 10 years or so and most importantly, they're in the south. I'm hoping we don't have to deal with Teddy Bridgewater...
 
They aren't anything special academically, but they have pretty good basketball, their football has been pretty good the last 10 years or so and most importantly, they're in the south. I'm hoping we don't have to deal with Teddy Bridgewater...

Next year the two Atlantic division games will either be Clemson and BC (if rotation stays same) or Clemson and FSU (if they drop current rotation and move to next cycle).
 
The ACC should really wait and see if Strong is still there a month from now. Otherwise we got nothing but a basketball team.
 
Next year the two Atlantic division games will either be Clemson and BC (if rotation stays same) or Clemson and FSU (if they drop current rotation and move to next cycle).
He'll probably be graduated by the time they join in football anyway. Which I assume would be 2014?
 
The ACC should really wait and see if Strong is still there a month from now. Otherwise we got nothing but a basketball team.

Ehh. It's not about Strong. It's really about placating FSU and Clemson and adding a good football school to a pathetic conference that is getting laughed at nationally.
 
Is it really important to decide this so hastily?
 
Why are we adding the best basketball teams from the Big East. That's all this conference is turning into and all it will ever be in the upcoming future. Heck, if we can beat the SEC and B1G in football, then we'll beat their ass in basketball for sure. We can dang sure get bigger players that way.
Good luck Coach Gregory.
 
Louisville national undergraduate ranking: #160
Current lowest ranked ACC team: FSU @ #101

Louisville is an SEC-level academic school with no real revenue benefits. We might as well just take UConn if we're worried about basketball.

If this is real, it's the worst decision ever made by the ACC (and that includes those stupid maternity ward commercials). If there are no good schools available, just wait. A 13-team football conference isn't the end of the world.
 
They're just voting on it right now, nothing is official. So...there is some hope left
 
If this goes official, I am writing an e-mail to President Peterson that this school should no longer be a part of the ACC. It should try its best to take UVA with it to the B1G. Also add to the note that one can only hope the President voted as a GT leader should on this particular expansion effort.

Please join me in contacting Bud/Bud's office.

http://www.gatech.edu/president/contact.html
 
Geez, why didn't we try to add WVU then? At least they have good sports. Louisville sucks academically and athletically.

They're just voting on it right now, nothing is official. So...there is some hope left

I doubt they would call a vote if they didn't know which way it was going.
 
Geez, why didn't we try to add WVU then? At least they have good sports. Louisville sucks academically and athletically.

Exactly. It looks like Swofford and the rest of the ACC were absolutely blindsided by the defection of MD.
 
Louisville is the best option available. The ACC can help them improve their academics, though they've been improving it themselves quite a bit the last few years.

This conference doesn't need another craptastic team in the frozen tundra origins of carpetbaggers and snowbirds that doesn't have fans and doesn't field a competitive product. What the ACC needs more than anything else is a team with a damned pulse in football. And UCONN aint it. Louisville athletics is a net upgrade over Maryland athletics in literally everything except lacrosse and soccer. And if those are your sports, may I suggest Johns Hopkins? The Louisville basketball program alone makes almost TWICE the annual profit the GTAA makes on EVERYTHING.

If you want to play in the all academic conference, apply to the Ivy League and drop to FCS in football... because nobody here can tell me with a straight face that you can be nationally competitive, consistent, relevant, and fighting for titles if you're tough academically across the board. The only program that has been consistently Top 25 the last 5 years with an elite academic reputation is Stanford, and even Stanford has the infamous "easy A list" and majors to hide players in. If you gripe about UofL academics you should be barred from ever making a post on any GT board suggesting academic changes for GT's football woes, and yea, I think the Hill is part of the problem (but by no means all of it).
 
And FWIW I favor trading Boston College for Cincinnati to the Big East. Everybody wins but BC and that's just dandy. Cincinnati has rivalries with UofL and VT and Pitt. NC State level academics and athletics, and a big fat endowment.
 
I don't want L'ville added, but they do have currently a better FB program than the school we just lost.
 
Back
Top