BuzzCzar
Defender of the Universe
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2003
- Messages
- 51,716
i agree. its the dumbest idea of allThat's exactly what it will lead to, especially if it's capped so that only student athletes can get in.
i agree. its the dumbest idea of allThat's exactly what it will lead to, especially if it's capped so that only student athletes can get in.
It's not even a slippery slope matter of leading to anything. ramblinwise wants to implement an exact copy of UNC's AA degrees and just not call it that.That's exactly what it will lead to, especially if it's capped so that only student athletes can get in.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
its ok, according to ramblinwise the black kids cant learn anything anyways as they are too dumb and lazy - might as well get a few wins out of emIt's not even a slippery slope matter of leading to anything. ramblinwise wants to implement an exact copy of UNC's AA degrees and just not call it that.
link?its ok, according to ramblinwise the black kids cant learn anything anyways as they are too dumb and lazy - might as well get a few wins out of em
Digital Communications. The degree focuses on methods and systems for communicating through social and other forms of digital media, including how people connect, interact, create followers, and influence others.Instead of the M-train, we could have the Communications subway.
You're asking a board full of dudes to help you get your pole up?One of you young whipersnappers needs to turn this to a poll sosen we can vote. I would but I is a confirmed idiot with PB&J tendencies.
Choices need to be:
1) Just accept more exceptions for football
2) Come up with an athletic friendly major
3) Go to D3 football
4) Drop football and play soccer
5) Do nothing
Then we can settle the issue democratically once and fer all.
Wouldn't a major like that be very popular with non-athletes though? That sounds like something we might actually want to have, sort of a more technically slanted management degree.Digital Communications. The degree focuses on methods and systems for communicating through social and other forms of digital media, including how people connect, interact, create followers, and influence others.
Degree resides in the LCC school with courses taken in public policy and computational media. Graduates are prepared to work for political campaigns, companies, and start-ups to create social media presence.
Football recruiters can say "hey, you can major in Twitter". It meets with GT's mission statement, and it wouldn't be hard to get through the Academic Senate or the BoR.
Yes, which is why it would be approved by the faculty.Wouldn't a major like that be very popular with non-athletes though? That sounds like something we might actually want to have, sort of a more technically slanted management degree.
Nope. People don't come to Tech to major in things like this, they come for engineering. Some students decide later that engineering isn't their thing and search for a major like this, but it wouldn't be overrun with people looking for an easy major. If that was the case other liberal arts-type majors (computational media, industrial design, public policy, HTS, etc.) would be overrun right now.If non-athletes are actually interested in taking it, that would raise competition to get into it, raise the overall level of classes in the program, make it more difficult, and then we'd just end up in the same situation as we are in now.
It wouldn't be a worthless major. Actually make it valuable, but make it a practical degree focused on technical communications and social media, not an engineering or science major. Tech already has majors like this, it's just that you can't really recruit football players by pitching a major where you design chairs. You can recruit them with Facebook and Twitter.Generally football players get stuck in majors that no one else wants to take where no one cares if the classes are worthless. You can't create a degree that would have actual demand to hide players in.
I'm not really sure I buy that. With the HOPE scholarship, good students have two choices: U[sic]GA and GT. There are plenty of people who want a good education and don't want to go to U[sic]GA. I figured they ended up in Management/Business because it's not technical but it's also not super specific or academic, like chair designing (lol) or HTS or even international affairs.Nope. People don't come to Tech to major in things like this, they come for engineering. Some students decide later that engineering isn't their thing and search for a major like this, but it wouldn't be overrun with people looking for an easy major. If that was the case other liberal arts-type majors (computational media, industrial design, public policy, HTS, etc.) would be overrun right now.
I don't have firsthand knowledge of the situation, but I think you overestimate the difference that the area of a major makes to good football recruits. I think they want to hear that it's not much work and you don't have to do calculus. When U[sic]GA recruited Jarvis Jones, I don't think they were selling him on how rewarding the field of Child and Family development is.It wouldn't be a worthless major. Actually make it valuable, but make it a practical degree focused on technical communications and social media, not an engineering or science major. Tech already has majors like this, it's just that you can't really recruit football players by pitching a major where you design chairs. You can recruit them with Facebook and Twitter.
Assuming the kid qualified to get in to begin with, that would make them--NOT a weak student. Also assuming they would still have to work damned hard to get out (which is a major draw to company recruiters), they would still make whoever they went to work for a valued employee relative to most all other college grads. So, NO andrew, it wouldn't cheapen our degrees.I think you are very out of touch with the current Tech environment. People bail to the easiest major all the time; it happens so often that it is a running joke around the school.There would be a lot of people who currently can't cut it switching to this major and graduating.
And I really don't see how you can say reducing the quality of the average Tech grad won't reduce the value of a degree. Right now the Tech name is a differentiator because, among other reasons, there is a great chance of getting an outstanding worker if you hire a Tech grad, no matter the major. Dilute the grad pool and that becomes less and less true.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2