georgiatech22
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2008
- Messages
- 6,614
Has there been any rumors going around about our AD search and who we may possibly be going after?
Hey, I like that Social Circle pic you got there!Has there been any rumors going around about our AD search and who we may possibly be going after?
Monte KiffinHas there been any rumors going around about our AD search and who we may possibly be going after?
Thanks! I'm the QB's coach and assistant Girls Basketball coach there.Hey, I like that Social Circle pic you got there!
I enjoyed to play football against ya'll waaaay back in the late 90'sThanks! I'm the QB's coach and assistant Girls Basketball coach there.
I think he'd be an excellent choice. Did PJ push too hard with DRad?I talked to Stansbury when he was in St. Pete. He is interested, but wants more money and assurance that PJ will not control. Seems reasonable to me.
He wants a 6 year no cut contract, regardless of the conference changes,and no buyout on his part.
I would be ok with this.I talked to Stansbury when he was in St. Pete. He is interested, but wants more money and assurance that PJ will not control. Seems reasonable to me.
He wants a 6 year no cut contract, regardless of the conference changes,and no buyout on his part.
Bud.I would be ok with this.
I am not sure how this works, but who will assure him that PJ won't control? Who has that authority? BoR?
ha i never once heard that.I think he'd be an excellent choice. Did PJ push too hard with DRad?
PJ gave him the cut, chop and scheme every snap. That's why Drad pee'd in his pants when told not to tell PJ about the investigation into impermissible benefits to our players.I think he'd be an excellent choice. Did PJ push too hard with DRad?
I thought this said Starbury when I first read itI talked to Stansbury when he was in St. Pete. He is interested, but wants more money and assurance that PJ will not control. Seems reasonable to me.
He wants a 6 year no cut contract, regardless of the conference changes,and no buyout on his part.
Why should anybody get a one sided contract with no buyout but an ironclad commitment from the school?I talked to Stansbury when he was in St. Pete. He is interested, but wants more money and assurance that PJ will not control. Seems reasonable to me.
He wants a 6 year no cut contract, regardless of the conference changes,and no buyout on his part.
My sources tell me we'll never guess who it is. Then they snicker and say "seriously dude guess". Then they snicker some more. My sources are really immature and not very useful.any update on this?
We are gonna find out very soon.Why should anybody get a one sided contract with no buyout but an ironclad commitment from the school?
The rest may be reasonable, but I got my fill of one sided contracts with Hewitt.
If we want to sign a death pact with our next AD to give them leeway to work (reasonable but scary) then they need some skin in the game too.