UNC @ GT Predictions

Techbert said:
We will beat them so badly they will actually try going straight!
Click to expand...
I am going to assume the idiot that disliked this post did not realize "going straight" means to stop committing crimes and start being honest.
 
JJacket said:
Clemson's D >>> UNC's D

Gibbs will have 2 TD's
Mason will have 1 TD
Smith will have 1 TD
McGowan will have 1 TD
One of our other WR's will have a TD catch.

Bank it.
Click to expand...
The transitive property to judging different FB Teams is very unreliable

Based on what you wrote above , you have us scoring 6 TDs, that means that you think UNC has a Kennesaw State level defense

This matchup is about styles, UNC thinks that they can out-Athlete us when they have the Ball, can we execute and play disciplined Defense if they Run Tempo?

If they get a Quick TD & FG do we keep doing what we do, or does that throw us off schedule?

Supposed they are up 2 Scores can we Run Tempo and execute mistake free when we have the Ball?

Just stuff to think about
 
PressManCoverage said:
The transitive property to judging different FB Teams is very unreliable

Based on what you wrote above , you have us scoring 6 TDs, that means that you think UNC has a Kennesaw State level defense

This matchup is about styles, UNC thinks that they can out-Athlete us when they have the Ball, can we execute and play disciplined Defense if they Run Tempo?

If they get a Quick TD & FG do we keep doing what we do, or does that throw us off schedule?

Supposed they are up 2 Scores can we Run Tempo and execute mistake free when we have the Ball?

Just stuff to think about
Click to expand...

You said yourself transitive properties don't translate to football, so why would you assume he thinks UNC has a D on par with KSU? Isn't that self contradictive?
 
PressManCoverage said:
The transitive property to judging different FB Teams is very unreliable

Based on what you wrote above , you have us scoring 6 TDs, that means that you think UNC has a Kennesaw State level defense

This matchup is about styles, UNC thinks that they can out-Athlete us when they have the Ball, can we execute and play disciplined Defense if they Run Tempo?

If they get a Quick TD & FG do we keep doing what we do, or does that throw us off schedule?

Supposed they are up 2 Scores can we Run Tempo and execute mistake free when we have the Ball?

Just stuff to think about
Click to expand...
You misunderstand the transitive property, first off

Clemson's defense is one of the best in CFB
UNC's defense surrenders points and yardage

This isn't that difficult
 
Vespid said:
You said yourself transitive properties don't translate to football, so why would you assume he thinks UNC has a D on par with KSU? Isn't that self contradictive?
Click to expand...
We scored roughly 6 TDs vs KSU, and he listed the players that were going to score 6 TDs, so I compared it to the Team on our Sked that gave up that much to us
 
JJacket said:
You misunderstand the transitive property, first off

Clemson's defense is one of the best in CFB
UNC's defense surrenders points and yardage

This isn't that difficult
Click to expand...
What we know so far is that UNC's Defense surrendered points & yardage vs a Broncho Mendenhall coached UVa Team, we have no idea how that translates vs our OLine, I say that not to take a shot at our Guys, but Mendenhall's Teams usually play pretty physical along the Lines of Scrimmage

Giving up points to UVa doesn't mean they will give up points to us as easily
 
PressManCoverage said:
We scored roughly 6 TDs vs KSU, and he listed the players that were going to score 6 TDs, so I compared it to the Team on our Sked that gave up that much to us
Click to expand...
KSU ran clock. UNC won't. We are going to have more offensive opportunities against UNC

I do worry about how poorly we substitute on defense when the other team is in hurry up, and UNC will do that. It is probably our poorest area of the game.

I expect at least 10 "injuries" to our OL and DL during the game to slow things up a bit and give the DL a rest
 
PressManCoverage said:
What we know so far is that UNC's Defense surrendered points & yardage vs a Broncho Mendenhall coached UVa Team, we have no idea how that translates vs our OLine, I say that not to take a shot at our Guys, but Mendenhall's Teams usually play pretty physical along the Lines of Scrimmage

Giving up points to UVa doesn't mean they will give up points to us as easily
Click to expand...
Doesn't mean they won't.
UVA is not that physical of a team
 
PressManCoverage said:
We scored roughly 6 TDs vs KSU, and he listed the players that were going to score 6 TDs, so I compared it to the Team on our Sked that gave up that much to us
Click to expand...
Yes, I get the comparison and the reason you chose KSU. The point is, in one sentence, you say the tran......never mind. Doesn't matter.
 
coit said:
You gave me a poo for picking us to win, so I'll give you one as well.
Click to expand...
I will point out that you bigcried the Clemson prediction that turned out to be the winning prediction. So I figured I owed you one.

But I'll at least give you credit for actually making a UNC prediction since I don't recall seeing your Clemson prediction.
 
I really don't like this matchup.

No score. UNCheat wins. Hope to be wrong.

Go Jackets!
 
00Burdell said:
I will point out that you bigcried the Clemson prediction that turned out to be the winning prediction. So I figured I owed you one.

But I'll at least give you credit for actually making a UNC prediction since I don't recall seeing your Clemson prediction.
Click to expand...

I don't make predictions to lose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top