So, Julian Burnett is going to start at LB this week

Ish

Ish

Dodd-Like
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
6,345
According to GoJackets.com, we're going to be in more of a 4-3 defense this week.

Awesome.
 
Good. Idk who else legitimately runs a 4-2-5 as their base D in D-1 other than us.
 
So the way I read that I took it as Sweeting is starting this week. Correct?
 
Wow, they are really shaking things up. Good. It needed to be done. As in the fine words of Barney Fife: "NIP IT, NIP IT, NIP IT!!!!!"

nipit.jpg
 
drinkclearwiskey said:
Wow, they are really shaking things up. Good. It needed to be done. As in the fine words of Barney Fife: "NIP IT, NIP IT, NIP IT!!!!!"

nipit.jpg
Click to expand...
I got my bullet, Sheriff!

This is good news. He's been impressive so far this season.
 
Who made the decision? Does Paul mingle with the D? Or is this a Wommack adjustment? Credits to Dave if that is so.
 
One of the reasons for trying the 4-3 look tonight is that it appears Cooper is definitely out for the game and Reese is still in a non-contact jersey.

Cannot have two of your three safeties out and not have an impact.
 
Ish, where exactly did you read this? The only thing I read was the weekly depth chart they put out on the insiders board and its the same except Walls is replacing Peters and Reid is playing safety while Reese is playing the Wolf. No significant changes on offense other than Melton playing for Cone. According to it, Julian Burnett is not starting.
 
BarrelORum said:
Ish, where exactly did you read this? The only thing I read was the weekly depth chart they put out on the insiders board and its the same except Walls is replacing Peters and Reid is playing safety while Reese is playing the Wolf. No significant changes on offense other than Melton playing for Cone. According to it, Julian Burnett is not starting.
Click to expand...

Rivals Insider has a lot of new tidbits tonight....they have someone at every practice to chat with the coaches.

There are several others. Here is another tidbit....Claytor will start over Sellers at LT.
 
Im glad the coaches are mixing it up a little this is something the old regime would have never done. It builds up my confidence in our coaches!!
 
amen! now we need Cox at B back with Dwyer and Roddy at the A's...AA can back up Cox, then Wright and Smith back up the a's- tha's the way I see it anyway-
 
goose said:
amen! now we need Cox at B back with Dwyer and Roddy at the A's...AA can back up Cox, then Wright and Smith back up the a's- tha's the way I see it anyway-
Click to expand...

I don't know.... Cox throws some mean blocks from the A back position. Bottom line is, put Cox on the field!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top