The Hill says 60% of kids in GA we can\'t recruit
Assume for a minute with me that this stat is accurate.
What should Chan's success rate with the other 40% of eligible kids be? Should it be 50%? With fewer kids in state to focus our resources on, I feel that we should do better than average in closing them.
However let us give Gailey the benefit of the doubt and say that he can only be expected close 1/3 of the eligible kids. That means that Chan and Company should be able to land
6 of the Top 50 in Georgia
3 of the Top 25 in Georgia
In the Southeast, their success ratio would be lower than 1/3 due to broader competition. But we should be able to pull a few across the region.
According to Scout.com we signed zero of the Top 20 kids in Georgia. 1 of the Top 25 kids in Georgia (#22). And 4 of the Top 50 kids in Georgia. Two of the Top 100 kids in the south.
In my strongly restrained opinion, this coaching staff isn't even trying to recruit this state.
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wtf.gif
Assume for a minute with me that this stat is accurate.
What should Chan's success rate with the other 40% of eligible kids be? Should it be 50%? With fewer kids in state to focus our resources on, I feel that we should do better than average in closing them.
However let us give Gailey the benefit of the doubt and say that he can only be expected close 1/3 of the eligible kids. That means that Chan and Company should be able to land
6 of the Top 50 in Georgia
3 of the Top 25 in Georgia
In the Southeast, their success ratio would be lower than 1/3 due to broader competition. But we should be able to pull a few across the region.
According to Scout.com we signed zero of the Top 20 kids in Georgia. 1 of the Top 25 kids in Georgia (#22). And 4 of the Top 50 kids in Georgia. Two of the Top 100 kids in the south.
In my strongly restrained opinion, this coaching staff isn't even trying to recruit this state.
/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wtf.gif