No All-ACC Players

Why would they take players from a 3 win team?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I hope 3-9 and 1-7 in the ACC pisses them off
 
I hope that our guys don't need a losing season and/or no preseason accolades to get them motivated.

Well an 11-3 season, coming off an orange bowl win against a team that was ranked number 1 for 4 weeks (and a complete destruction too), a very emotional uga win in the cesspool and #7 and #8 finish in the polls doesn't get them motivated obviously. So we're all kinda hoping that they feel bad enough about the ööööshow they displayed last year and they keep their noses to the grindstone to put on a better display of football.
 
I hope that our guys don't need a losing season and/or no preseason accolades to get them motivated.

Every player at every level needs motivation. Some get it from being dropped down on the depth chart. Some get it from losing (Tim Tebow for instance). Every player needs motivation no matter how good they are.
 
I have a lot of hope for Gamble this year. Late last year he was hard to block and was very good at being in his gap. He played well against UGA. He is underappreciated in my opinion. Takes more than one player or defensive lineman but hope Gamble plays like he can. Other ACC hopeful is Justin.
 
Who on our team deserves to be preseason All-ACC based on last season? Exactly.

I expect that we will have some by the end of the year, but this season will have to look much different than last.
 
Who on our team deserves to be preseason All-ACC based on last season? Exactly.

I expect that we will have some by the end of the year, but this season will have to look much different than last.

Pre-season all ACC should not be based on last season. That's what last season's real all ACC list was for. Gotta look for guys who have potential to be all ACC and put them on the list, not just guys who have already been on the list.

That said, my only complaint with the list is that the near majority of it comes from one school. Malarkey, says I. You mean to tell me that Clemson nearly has a roster better than the rest of the ACC combined? They're good, but haha no.
 
Pre-season all ACC should not be based on last season. That's what last season's real all ACC list was for. Gotta look for guys who have potential to be all ACC and put them on the list, not just guys who have already been on the list.

That said, my only complaint with the list is that the near majority of it comes from one school. Malarkey, says I. You mean to tell me that Clemson nearly has a roster better than the rest of the ACC combined? They're good, but haha no.
Agree with TIA. I understand Watson, but the pickers seem to have been napping during the '14 Orange Bowl. So, Butker didn't even make 3rd team!?
 
Pre-season all ACC should not be based on last season. That's what last season's real all ACC list was for. Gotta look for guys who have potential to be all ACC and put them on the list, not just guys who have already been on the list.

That said, my only complaint with the list is that the near majority of it comes from one school. Malarkey, says I. You mean to tell me that Clemson nearly has a roster better than the rest of the ACC combined? They're good, but haha no.

I heard some Clemson fan say the other day that this year they're even better than Alabama. So it must be true.
 
We are going to play Clemson in BDS on a Thursday night on ESPN while we are an unranked team. There is only one way this ends. Bank a W.
 
Pre-season all ACC should not be based on last season. That's what last season's real all ACC list was for. Gotta look for guys who have potential to be all ACC and put them on the list, not just guys who have already been on the list.

That said, my only complaint with the list is that the near majority of it comes from one school. Malarkey, says I. You mean to tell me that Clemson nearly has a roster better than the rest of the ACC combined? They're good, but haha no.

Regardless, players demonstrate their potential largely through their play last season. Who on our team showed enough potential (from an outsider's perspective) to merit a spot on the team? Nobody.
 
We are gonna beat Clemson's ass on a Thursday night. They will score some points, but we are gonna get a TDET (Touchdown Every Time)
 
Regardless, players demonstrate their potential largely through their play last season. Who on our team showed enough potential (from an outsider's perspective) to merit a spot on the team? Nobody.

Can you kindly point out where I said "we should have players on this list" or anything even resembling that statement?
 
Back
Top