Official Kirk Herbstreit's Worthless Opinion Thread

Kirby mentioned his team being good in all facets of the game. Referenced his top 15 defense and top 15 offense.

Guess he forgot to talk about the whole coaching decisions aspect.
 
well, their goggled dipshit PK sucked tonight, and their Fake Kick unit cost 'em 2 losses.

öööö you, Smart.
 
gtfan088 said:
Kirby Smart says UGA should be in because they beat a lot of bowl-eligible teams :bowrofl:
Click to expand...

The smartest thing Shart said was at the end of that interview: "I don't know".

He comes up with this stupid idea of how Saban should be asked who he wants to play and how they don't want Georgia. Is that how we do it now? They had a chance to win and blew it. It's 4 quarters, Shart. You and big-game Jake need to get a room and console each other.

öööö Georgia.
 
BuzzLaw said:
This argument fails. So every other team doesn’t have a playoff game but uga does? Hey, if it works out cause it’s uga, then great, but it’s a bullshit argument. Uga shouldn’t go because the two best teams they played beat them.
Click to expand...
This argument does not fail. The other contenders (OU and OSU) did have playoff games... they had to win their conference championship games. No way in the world either would be in this discussion if they'd lost today.

The broader issue, though, is that the reason we moved from the BCS (trying match up the #1 and the #2 teams) to the CFP was because it was unfair that the #3 never got a chance to prove it could beat those higher teams. But tonight UGA got a chance to beat Alabama, and failed.

What possibly rationale is there for giving them a second chance to beat Alabama, and not giving Oklahoma that chance? The ol' "eye test"? If we're gonna go by the "eye test" then let's just give the CFP slots each year to the team with the highest recruiting rankings. Giving UGA a mulligan against Alabama literally one week after they lost to Alabama is the most retarded anti-American anti-competition anti-little guy BS I've ever heard of. Results on the field must trump EVERYTHING.

This is America. Losers go home, not forward. Basing anything on the "eye test" simply keeps control of the game in the hands of recruiting rankings and talking heads and smoke-filled-rooms, and takes power out of the hands of the players – the antithesis of the purpose of the CFP and the beauty of CFB.

/rant
 
18in32 said:
This argument does not fail. The other contenders (OU and OSU) did have playoff games... they had to win their conference championship games. No way in the world either would be in this discussion if they'd lost today.

The broader issue, though, is that the reason we moved from the BCS (trying match up the #1 and the #2 teams) to the CFP was because it was unfair that the #3 never got a chance to prove it could beat those higher teams. But tonight UGA got a chance to beat Alabama, and failed.

What possibly rationale is there for giving them a second chance to beat Alabama, and not giving Oklahoma that chance? The ol' "eye test"? If we're gonna go by the "eye test" then let's just give the CFP slots each year to the team with the highest recruiting rankings. Giving UGA a mulligan against Alabama literally one week after they lost to Alabama is the most retarded anti-American anti-competition anti-little guy BS I've ever heard of. Results on the field must trump EVERYTHING.

This is America. Losers go home, not forward. Basing anything on the "eye test" simply keeps control of the game in the hands of recruiting rankings and talking heads and smoke-filled-rooms, and takes power out of the hands of the players – the antithesis of the purpose of the CFP and the beauty of CFB.

/rant
Click to expand...
For öööös sake read the last sentence of my post before you go ranting
 
BuzzLaw said:
For öööös sake read the last sentence of my post before you go ranting
Click to expand...
Yeah, I did. It seems to lie in tension with the first part of your post. And the first part of your post is the BS that Herbstreit was spouting. Hence the rant.
 
18in32 said:
Yeah, I did. It seems to lie in tension with the first part of your post. And the first part of your post is the BS that Herbstreit was spouting. Hence the rant.
Click to expand...
The first part relates to ND. The second part relates to UGAy. First, You shouldn’t punish a team that plays an extra game and award a team that sits on their ass. Second, Uga ain’t in cause they got beat by two teams. They aren’t even the first or second best team in their conference.

Again. I think the best way to select is the power 5 conferences give the committee their representative. Pick it however they like. Then the committee chooses 4 of those 5 teams
 
Herbstreit is a POS. Two loss UGA doesn’t deserve to be in over 1 loss OU or OSU. I don’t care who OSU lost to, tell me who UGA beat that was worth a öööö.

This quality loss bullshit counting more than actual wins is horseshit.
 
BuzzLaw said:
I thought the committee’s stated goal is to seed the 4 best teams. If you think uga is one of the best 4, they should be in. They shouldn’t be punished because they played the number one team in a conference championship while ND sat on their assload of money cause they are too good for conference play.

I personally believe each power 5 conference should pick its representative by whatever means it wants, and the committee should seed the top 4 out of those teams. But if it’s just about picking the best 4 teams, then ND shouldn’t be there.

Seriously, if I had to pick a team out of the top 10 to play for the championship, Florida would be first followed by ND. And friggin UCF is in the top 10 haha
Click to expand...
Florida? Damn, you drunk
 
wesleyd21 said:
Kirby mentioned his team being good in all facets of the game. Referenced his top 15 defense and top 15 offense.

Guess he forgot to talk about the whole coaching decisions aspect.
Click to expand...
Austin Peay, MTSU, UMass, GT. As mediocre as we are, we are the best of the Gagger ooc schedule. UGAg lost to the two best teams they have played. Herbstreit needs to come up off that SEC dick.
 
Roddy.JPG


Et tu, Roddy?
 
Every sport should just put the two best teams in when they get to the end of the season. Sure, the Braves were 40-122, but they won 32 of their last 40 games. Put them in the NLCS or just skip it and put them in the world series!!! Herbstreet is doing the old "everyone gets a medal" routine. You know what, UGAg lost two. That's it. They are out. There is no eye test to pick the teams you want regardless of losses. This is ööööing America, at least last I checked it was America

 
Georgia is not going ahead of Oklahoma or Ohio State. But, Herbstreit’s argument is a disservice to college football. That every game counts is what makes the regular season compelling. There should not be a playoff spot for the team that gives Alabama its best game. Losing to LSU matters. And, I would argue that this is why a team that has turned in consecutive 13-0 seasons should get its shot. We could see four unbeaten teams in the playoff this year. I am not stupid enough to believe UCF is better than OU, OSU, or UGA. They are deserving because they are in the same NCAA division and won every time out. If we want Herbie to design a system to get the four best teams, I have a plan. Let the defending champions get an automatic spot and let them play the twelve highest ranked teams throughout the season. The three that play them the best would make the playoffs. All the other games would have no consequence relative to the national championship. You like that plan, Herbie?
 
18in32 said:
This argument does not fail. The other contenders (OU and OSU) did have playoff games... they had to win their conference championship games. No way in the world either would be in this discussion if they'd lost today.

The broader issue, though, is that the reason we moved from the BCS (trying match up the #1 and the #2 teams) to the CFP was because it was unfair that the #3 never got a chance to prove it could beat those higher teams. But tonight UGA got a chance to beat Alabama, and failed.

What possibly rationale is there for giving them a second chance to beat Alabama, and not giving Oklahoma that chance? The ol' "eye test"? If we're gonna go by the "eye test" then let's just give the CFP slots each year to the team with the highest recruiting rankings. Giving UGA a mulligan against Alabama literally one week after they lost to Alabama is the most retarded anti-American anti-competition anti-little guy BS I've ever heard of. Results on the field must trump EVERYTHING.

This is America. Losers go home, not forward. Basing anything on the "eye test" simply keeps control of the game in the hands of recruiting rankings and talking heads and smoke-filled-rooms, and takes power out of the hands of the players – the antithesis of the purpose of the CFP and the beauty of CFB.

/rant
Click to expand...

Holy öööö I just ran through a wall after reading that. And it was a nice wall. The best wall. The wall just got taller!!!! America!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top