6 Wins

Their site doesn't even have 2017 schedules loaded in yet. Funny.

7 wins, no problem.
 
This other casino had it at 6.5:
https://stingtalk.com/board/threads/2017-gt-wins-over-under.93024/

5dimes has it at 6.5 also.

Interesting prop bet on 5dimes:
Georgia Tech plays in New Year's Six +500
Georgia Tech Not selected for New Year's Six bowl -900

Was trying to find that thread but missed it.

6 is like five times as easy to bet on than 6.5. The push is the floor for reasonable outcomes. Unless Vegas knows about a bunch of injuries I can't really understand that line.
 
Why would any sportsbook use whole numbers? There should always be a .5 tacked on.
They must think their number is more profitable, especially considering they will get to hang on to your money for 4 months either way!
 
They must think their number is more profitable, especially considering they will get to hang on to your money for 4 months either way!

Yeah I can see that. Plus they don't have to pay out on the under on 6 wins, it would be 5 wins to pay the under. And like you said, they at least had money in hand as working capital for several months.
 
We've had fewer than 7 wins twice in the last 20 seasons. And fewer than 6 once. And we return the majority of our team. I just don't get it how they make these numbers. I'd put it at 8. Which probably means it should be at 7.5.
 
We've had fewer than 7 wins twice in the last 20 seasons. And fewer than 6 once. And we return the majority of our team. I just don't get it how they make these numbers. I'd put it at 8. Which probably means it should be at 7.5.

Probably due to Justin being gone. Seeing that he ran the offense and his back-up and likely replacement is injured probably makes them pessimistic.
 
Was trying to find that thread but missed it.

6 is like five times as easy to bet on than 6.5. The push is the floor for reasonable outcomes. Unless Vegas knows about a bunch of injuries I can't really understand that line.
It is because da 'U' is back
 
Like I told the gaggers last year, never underestimate the impact of starting a new quarterback, especially a freshman (in their case). Now they are saying Fromm is going to take the job away from Eason. sheesh. In our case if Jordan can build on his success and become a credible passer we won't be as affected, but if we end up starting one of the others you will see the variability you saw in the spring game.
 
Based on our results in 2015, I think I would rather be replacing the starting QB than replacing all the ABs and BBs.
 
I realize this is weak... but we also lost a lot of close games. Some career long FG's went against us, etc.
Agree, but those close games could have been won had one or two injuries (or replacements) had not occurred.
 
We've had fewer than 7 wins twice in the last 20 seasons. And fewer than 6 once. And we return the majority of our team.

The ACC is tougher than it used to be. And Jacksonville State is a tough cupcake, if even.
 
Back
Top