AJC: D. Morgan commits!!!

Not that I have anything against the kids but do we have the option of pulling the offers to teh two star recruits?
 
MacDaddy2 said:
Not that I have anything against the kids but do we have the option of pulling the offers to teh two star recruits?

I hope we don't do that one.

That's akin to taking a field goal off the scoreboard just to miss making a touchdown.

Unless the verbal has some problems such as academics, terrorism, etc., I don't see GT pulling the rug out from under him.

Besides, some of our lower star commits have proved to be gold.
 
I hope we don't do that one.

Me too. If we conduct recruiting business in that manner, we have no right to criticize any SA that decides he wants to change his mind at the last minute and go to another football program. I personally regard a commitment as a commitment and can't see Chan doing anything other than the honorable thing.
 
you mean the 2*'s like Wheeler?

Maybe we can give it to a 4* like David Jordan.

There were MANY 4*'s on Grant Field last saturday but they were not wearing Gold(except for 2?).
 
Welcome to the Flats Mr. Morgan, great choice!!! This class is amazing and I can't wait to see them in Gold next year!

GO JACKETS!!
 
MacDaddy2 said:
Not that I have anything against the kids but do we have the option of pulling the offers to teh (sic) two star recruits?

The coaches offered those "two star recruits" scholarships early because they can play. It's not their fault they are mis-ranked.

Gilbert's kept his weight down due to wrestling. He's already almost 300#, or higher. He will be a monster at OG.

Melton catches anything in the same zip code.

The only reason you have not heard more from Tarrant is because once he committed there was not a lot of reason to consider covering him.

The reality that we as part of the Georgia Tech family need to understand and never forget is that we are family. These kids are part of our family now.

This recruiting class gets it. If we started pulling it apart trying to count stars, we could end up watching the whole class fall apart; it is that close.

Every kid in this class is a player. We have not been able to say that since Pepper.
 
MacDaddy2 said:
Not that I have anything against the kids but do we have the option of pulling the offers to teh two star recruits?

What some service ranks players means 0. The coaches watch a kid, they make they're own rankings. So far, with 4 classes filled with mostly 2 and 3 stars, we're #20 in nation, 6-2, and have played the toughest schedule to this point in the nation. Tarrant, Gilbert, and Melton got a scholly offer because the coaches believe they are GOOD.

You don't get an early offer if the coaches don't think you're any good.

It kinda saddens me anyone would really say that. We're not Bear Bryant and Alabama.
 
Two reasons we don't "deoffer" any of the "two stars":

1. I'm not one of those who just say "the coaches liked him and that's enough for me." To put it bluntly, coaches would rather get commits from their first rounds of recruits than from recruits they offered in December. Previous years have seen a bit too much of the latter and not enough of the former. However, this year, just about all our commits were our coaches' first choices and this includes the three two stars. They're only under the radar mainly because they committed to us early and thus didn't get significant interest from other BCS schools. Also, Gilbert has had to keep his weight down from wrestling and has missed many camps for personal reasons which may have raised his ranking.

2. It's a bad precedent to set for future classes when we deoffer a recruit. One year, Tommy Bowden did this to a D-IA prospect in early January when a better recruit opened up. The recruit then ended up going to a D-IAA because all his previous offers had no more scholarships to give out by early January.

Really, it makes me sick that Clemson did this. I'm sure other schools used this incident to recruit against Clemson and I know if I was a recruit, I would think twice before commiting to Clemson.
 
Fair enough. It does seem a shame that we may have to pass on better athletes due to early commits but given the way things are going at the Flats I think we will be just fine!

Wake is fake, Duke is puke, but the team I hate is NC Stte. Go Jackets!
 
macdaddy, the point is our coaches don't necessarily believe we're passing on better athletes. They offered those kids because they want them. They don't care what the services think about them because they have seen them play and know what they can do. The services aren't really looking at them any more because the drama's gone. They've commited and they aren't wavering, so there's no reason for any recruiting service to spend time evaluating them. I would bet that at least some of the services have never seen them and only bumped them to 2 stars because they've committed to a D-1 program.
 
Back
Top