are we 1-dimensional?

Brilliant.png
 
fine. i'll give you a thought.

lou holtz just said that you have to be two-dimensional to win in the SEC....

would we win in the SEC? i don't think so. at least not as much as one would think.

why? our passing game is pathetic.

will we get better? of course.

but to think that we're top 10 material.....i thought again.

i'm usually pretty positive but just got to thinkin'

here's to tomorrow:cheers:
 
buzztheirazz said:
fine. i'll give you a thought.

lou holtz just said that you have to be two-dimensional to win in the SEC....

would we win in the SEC? i don't think so. at least not as much as one would think.

why? our passing game is pathetic.

will we get better? of course.

but to think that we're top 10 material.....i thought again.

i'm usually pretty positive but just got to thinkin'

here's to tomorrow:cheers:
Click to expand...

right now we have been playing as if we are 0.5 dimensional. Here's hoping we have a good day tomorrow.
 
Well, we're 12th in passing yards/game, but Nesbitt is 8th in pass efficiency and Thomas is first in yards per catch.

I don't know that you call us one-dimensional, but we're probably the next closest thing.
 
as long as that dimension is the W-dimension, who gives a s@#$??

when it becomes the L dimension, we have a problem
 
Yukonwreck said:
right now we have been playing as if we are 0.5 dimensional. Here's hoping we have a good day tomorrow.
Click to expand...

+1.5

I have faith in the Jackets, but we have looked pretty bad so far this season. Even the Coach said that we aren't doing anything well on either side of the ball. At this point we are "one-dimensional" only in our wildest dreams.

(And everyone lay off Yukon btw. He might be on the pessimistic side, but it's obvious he loves Tech, and that's good enough for me.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top