Bowls east of the Mississippi comments?

thwg

Damn Good Rat
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Messages
1,454
Guys, whether you hate him or are neutral can we please quit the ridiculous comments about WHERE georgaphically we go to a bowl. You guys let Ugagers influence your opinion of our teams and this is a prime example.

In 1997, we were 6-5 and went to the Carjack bowl. Was that a good bowl? In 2001 with on paper the second best GT team in the last 30 years we went to Seattle and beat a top 15 Stanford team.

The bowl location has 100% to do with the suckiness of the ACC and its bowl tie-ins and zero to do with whether we had a successful season or not. BC will likely go to the Champs bowl this year and play a joke Big 10 team. they still had a great year but in bowl terms they'll be behind 8 SEC schools.

If we had the same years as Miss State, UK, Bama, Auburn, SoCar, Arkansas, etc. no one would feel one iota better about this team but gosh darn it they all go to name bowls east of the MS. Why? because they are in the SEC.

If you want better bowls, then we need to join the SEC because the ACC bowl tie-ins are pathetic. The Chichk-fil-A would love a 7-5 GT team right now over their SEC choices but they have no choice.

It doesn't matter how bad we were or are or what we'll be like next year, our bowl options are basically a BCS bowl, beg into the Gator, or no name bowl vs. top 40 team. It's what the ACC has but it is no way an indicator of the strength of a GT team year in and year out.
 
Would you really rank:

a) Silicon Valley Classic v. Fresno State
b) Emerald Bowl v. Utah
c) Humanitarian Bowl v. Tulsa

ahead of:

d) Gator Bowl v. Notre Dame
e) Gator Bowl v. Miami
f) Peach Bowl v. LSU

?
 
The bowl location has 100% to do with the suckiness of the ACC and its bowl tie-ins and zero to do with whether we had a successful season or not.

I agree with you up to a point.

The Orange, the Gator and the Peach are 3 good games, and only 3 teams out of this league need to play post season football.

Now, if everyone would recognize that the Emerald, Boise, etc. games are merely field trip exhibitions trying to get people to have a good time and spend some money, no one gets their feelings hurt.
The football season came to a careening halt last night in Sanford SW.
 
It also has to do with how many fans you bring to the bowl, and obviously Tech is way behind SEC teams in that. Especially when it ends the year with a loss to UGA.
 
I agree that east or west of the Mississippi River has little to do with the quality of the bowls. The Rose Bowl is west of the Mississippi. (Maybe we are facing payback lately in California for Riegels' run.)

However, the higher pecking order bowls in the ACC's allotment are east of the Mississippi. The ACC bowls west of the Mississippi are the lower pecking order bowls and not the Rose Bowl.

Also, travel opportunities for GT fans in the southeast are much higher for bowls east of the Mississippi than for bowls west of the Mississippi due to more airplane trips than car road trips to go west and the need to take more vacation days to follow the Jackets to the west coast.
 
Back
Top