Can't blame the defense

The d played good enough to win. Uga hasn't exactly been an juggernaut this year.
 
The d played until the end. CPJ öööö the bed this year. He was exposed.
 
The defense played like it was a rivalry game. Offense played like it was the Spring game.
 
CTR should
have come down from the booth and grabbed CPJ by the collar and yelled WTF!!!!
 
All season we had the World's Okayest Defense and I really thought that was all we would need.

The offense just collapsed this year. Next year will tell us which year was the aberration.
 
Agree that defense played adequate. But the Michelle touchdown was ridiculous.
 
ibeeballin said:
I really don't think you believe half the öööö you post.
Click to expand...

The offense sucked balls today, as it has much of the season. I was mildly surprised the defense played as well as it did given the attrition. The offense blames attrition from everywhere but the offensive line for why they suck.
 
Dirty Jacket said:
Agree that defense played adequate. But the Michelle touchdown was ridiculous.
Click to expand...

DJ, the defense played at a level (13 points) that would have put them in the top 3-5 in the nation, OK? Sound "adequate" to you!?
 
GoldZ said:
DJ, the defense played at a level (13 points) that would have put them in the top 3-5 in the nation, OK? Sound "adequate" to you!?
Click to expand...

What is your definition of adequate? Good enough to win? No pressure on Lambert, let them convert too many third and fourth downs. The 13 points was as much a credit to our defense as it is to Uga's offensive ineptitude. I'm not trying to be a negative nancy, but it's not like we held 2010 Oregon to 13 points bro.
 
Dirty Jacket said:
What is your definition of adequate? Good enough to win? No pressure on Lambert, let them convert too many third and fourth downs. The 13 points was as much a credit to our defense as it is to Uga's offensive ineptitude. I'm not trying to be a negative nancy, but it's not like we held 2010 Oregon to 13 points bro.
Click to expand...

The defense let in 13 points on fourteen drives. If that's just "adequate" to you, I think you have unrealistically high standards.

I mean, obviously they weren't perfect, and you could say they weren't even excellent, but holding your in state rival to 13 points on fourteen drives is pretty öööö good no matter how you measure it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk
 
andrew said:
The defense let in 13 points on fourteen drives. If that's just "adequate" to you, I think you have unrealistically high standards.

I mean, obviously they weren't perfect, and you could say they weren't even excellent, but holding your in state rival to 13 points on fourteen drives is pretty öööö good no matter how you measure it.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I am in no way knocking the defense. They played good enough. By definition the defense did enough to help us win, therefore, adequate. I didn't walk away with a raging hard on like you guys though thinking I just watched a Saban Defense. This is actually getting silly so I'll just concede...defense was lights out.
 
Dirty Jacket said:
I am in no way knocking the defense. They played good enough. By definition the defense did enough to help us win, therefore, adequate. I didn't walk away with a raging hard on like you guys though thinking I just watched a Saban Defense. This is actually getting silly so I'll just concede...defense was lights out.
Click to expand...

That's much more adequate!
 
Dirty Jacket said:
What is your definition of adequate? Good enough to win? No pressure on Lambert, let them convert too many third and fourth downs. The 13 points was as much a credit to our defense as it is to Uga's offensive ineptitude. I'm not trying to be a negative nancy, but it's not like we held 2010 Oregon to 13 points bro.
Click to expand...

Lol UGA was 4-14 on 3rd down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top