Clemson line?

Dead knees walking?

Oh you meant the Vegas line. No I don't know that line.
 
I know CPJ won't give us much or anything until Thursday but what type of injury did Brant Mitchell suffer in Miami? Really hope we get him back Saturday
 
It's gonna be a good one hopefully good in our favor, lets just leave it at that.
 
waiting for lane bryant status before they post....prolly wednesday release.

if i were a ramblin gamblin man (shit, shudda been my handle), i'd guess we're around 12-14 pt dogs. i figure they would be a td favorite at bd, so that number seems about right. it might be a little bit lower, because as you know, we've covered 10 straight games dating back to last year.

ftr, starting 10 weeks ago at $200 pop and using the "double up method" of parlaying winnings, you would be ONLY up $102,400 of house money (- the 200), right now, betting on gt. (not that anyone would do that). of course you'd have to risk the vig on your own dime. how would you have felt, being down 21-13 at half with $50.2 riding on the game? (serious brown liquor time!!). of course the odds of winning 10 straight coin flips are something like .001 or less, if my old memory is correct, so we are breaking all laws of probability. let's hope #11 is on the way...
 
moochie said:
waiting for lane bryant status before they post....prolly wednesday release.

if i were a ramblin gamblin man (öööö, shudda been my handle), i'd guess we're around 12-14 pt dogs. i figure they would be a td favorite at bd, so that number seems about right. it might be a little bit lower, because as you know, we've covered 10 straight games dating back to last year.

ftr, starting 10 weeks ago at $200 pop and using the "double up method" of parlaying winnings, you would be ONLY up $102,400 of house money (- the 200), right now, betting on gt. (not that anyone would do that). of course you'd have to risk the vig on your own dime. how would you have felt, being down 21-13 at half with $50.2 riding on the game? (serious brown liquor time!!). of course the odds of winning 10 straight coin flips are something like .001 or less, if my old memory is correct, so we are breaking all laws of probability. let's hope #11 is on the way...
Click to expand...

Lane Bryant...:lol2:
 
moochie said:
waiting for lane bryant status before they post....prolly wednesday release.

if i were a ramblin gamblin man (öööö, shudda been my handle), i'd guess we're around 12-14 pt dogs. i figure they would be a td favorite at bd, so that number seems about right. it might be a little bit lower, because as you know, we've covered 10 straight games dating back to last year.

ftr, starting 10 weeks ago at $200 pop and using the "double up method" of parlaying winnings, you would be ONLY up $102,400 of house money (- the 200), right now, betting on gt. (not that anyone would do that). of course you'd have to risk the vig on your own dime. how would you have felt, being down 21-13 at half with $50.2 riding on the game? (serious brown liquor time!!). of course the odds of winning 10 straight coin flips are something like .001 or less, if my old memory is correct, so we are breaking all laws of probability. let's hope #11 is on the way...
Click to expand...
Calling degenerate gamblers... degenerate gamblers...

</sarcasm> That's a pretty impressive line. I knew we were pretty good against the line, but I didn't realize we were THAT good. I couldn't bet Tech though. Too emotionally involved.
 
Not really 10 straight coin flips when the lines are dependent on outside perception of a historically undervalued team coming off 3-9 in 2015 and starting 5-4 in 2016.

15.5 is just another no-respect line that we’ll probably cover. We’re going to be a very trendy upset pick this week.

This matchup also has to be one of the hardest lines to make for Vegas every year. Clemson is dynamic enough to win a game by 17 that was close the whole way. And our offense can have us win/lose a close game that was dominated one way or the other.
 
Last edited:
If we can generate offense like we did for 3 qtrs against Miami then we have a shot. Keep in mind the Miami game was our worst offensive performance of the season, but was still far better than what we have done against Clemson the past couple of years. My bigger fear is that Clemson's front 7 completely dominates us and we have no answers offensively (see last season). Not many teams do that to us, but Clemson has the horses to where they could.
 
Marshall in obvious passing situations scares the bejesus out of me - for both his general safety as a human being against the manimals of Clemson's front 7 and our pass pro and less importantly his propensity to throw a feathery ball, if he's not able to get his feet set perfectly.

Anything between +14 and +20 is probably about right.
 
If the spread drops below 14, I'm betting on Clemson. I just don't feel good about this one. Now if we'd play two weeks ago (pre-Cuse loss) I'd have taken GT moneyline. But coming off a flat performance, with a pissed off team and a bye week to prepare? Nah.
 
johncu said:
If the spread drops below 14, I'm betting on Clemson. I just don't feel good about this one. Now if we'd play two weeks ago (pre-Cuse loss) I'd have taken GT moneyline. But coming off a flat performance, with a pissed off team and a bye week to prepare? Nah.
Click to expand...
All external signs point to a Clemson whooping. BUT! College Football be crazy.
 
On the weekly press conference, CPJ said Brad Morgan should be back this week.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top