Darwin Holt, Alabama linebacker involved in infamous 1961 play vs. Georgia Tech, has died
Texas native helped Crimson Tide to national championship as senior
www.al.com
Dodd is on record saying it was the scholarship issue. However, it was Alabama who was supposed to support Tech’s proposal and they failed to do so. Whether they were still sore about the spanking they got in the media, no one knows. If so, it could have had an indirect influence on Tech leaving. This would tend to support Bear’s full-fledged support for Tech to rejoin the SEC back in 1978.So which issue was the leading reason Dodd pulled us out of the SEC? Was it the 140 scholarship rule or was that just a smokescreen for lingering bitterness over the Graining-Holt issue. I've heard people say it was both. Either way, this issue was a defining moment in our history for all the wrong reasons.
The mutts voted against it too, after having said they fully supported it.Bryant knew the Mississippi schools would block an invite when he publicly supported us rejoining. It was window dressing.
The mutts also vetoed it the second time we tried. I think they knew having Tech back in the conference would have been a threat to them.The mutts voted against it too, after having said they fully supported it.
Wonder what the vote would look like now. We've been purposeful in scheduling home and homes with both Ole Miss and Miss St. Just about all of the people that were around to be sore at us would probably either be dead by now or not in any position to vote. I really think now we could get some favorable numbers even if UGA was to vote against us again.Bryant knew the Mississippi schools would block an invite when he publicly supported us rejoining. It was window dressing.
You know damn well the mutts would still vote against usWonder what the vote would look like now. We've been purposeful in scheduling home and homes with both Ole Miss and Miss St. Just about all of the people that were around to be sore at us would probably either be dead by now or not in any position to vote. I really think now we could get some favorable numbers even if UGA was to vote against us again.
Voted against what? The scholarship issue? I don’t think it ever got that far.The mutts voted against it too, after having said they fully supported it.
They abstained in that 1978 vote. Auburn was not voting us back in and they voted “no” second after Alabama voted “yes.” Dooley knew that the Mississippi schools were both “no,” so that was 3 “nos.” We had to have 7 “yeses.” Knowing this, Dooley abstained - not a “no” vote, but still robbing us of the chance to return. He left the final “no” up to Mississippi State. What a 1st Class Weenie he was!The mutts also vetoed it the second time we tried. I think they knew having Tech back in the conference would have been a threat to them.
No, they voted against Tech rejoining the SECVoted against what? The scholarship issue? I don’t think it ever got that far.
A non-vote in that case was essentially a no vote. Dooley just did not want us back in and he was not going to vote yes, but was apparently too chicken öööö to vote no.They abstained in that 1978 vote. Auburn was not voting us back in and they voted “no” second after Alabama voted “yes.” Dooley knew that the Mississippi schools were both “no,” so that was 3 “nos.” We had to have 7 “yeses.” Knowing this, Dooley abstained - not a “no” vote, but still robbing us of the chance to return. He left the final “no” up to Mississippi State. What a 1st Class Weenie he was!