Demjackets

[FAN OF BOBBY DODD]

I have questions about your credibilit. If DRAD told Chan to not interfere, I believe is the way you put it, with the offence and Chan stayed on in that situation I would loose respect for both of them. Now if DRAD gave Chan some advice in private with no demand I can see that. But for it to be the way I understand you are saying things happened I can't see how any head coach could keep his self respect and stay on nor can I respect an atheletic director who would put such demands on his head coach and on top of that let it become public.

I like many am disturbed about how things are going but I see no benefit comming from these rumors that are being promoted by you or anyone

 

[GTWannaBee]

There's a private message function on this board. Using it might be a good idea here. Unless of course you're just trying to piss off people.

 

[33jacket]

yeah...PM him if u have an issue. But Dem is right; and has the right perspective. Rather than getting lost in how something was done or what ramifications it has, just take away that they were addressing trying to open up the offense more; and let the coaches run a little more freely.

 

[FAN OF BOBBY DODD]

Wannabee, I am not trying to cause a problem. If you look at my posting in the past you will find I don't do things like. Demjackets had made such an issue publically on this that I felt the other side should be stated publically. That is what I did.

 

[demjackets]

I'm not asking you to believe me, if you dont want to dont read it thats your choice. Dont call me out though when you have no idea.

 

[ncjacket]

FOBD, none of us really knows what happened except Chan, DRad and maybe demjackets. But you aren't really stating the other side, you're just stating why you don't believe demjackets. He's stating what he claims to know, you're doubting his truthfulness. That's cool...if you don't believe hiim that's your prerogative. But the only other side would be that you KNOW it didn't happen, not that you can't believe it.