Dinich has VT winning

Is Dinich really trying to show that she doesn't watch the games? Give me a break...it might be 17-14 after the FIRST quarter!! :wow:
 
Heather writes her blogs in a way that makes it seem like she hates her job and is just waiting for another to open. She went to a Big 10 school, I bet if she had that job the quality of her articles would increase 10 fold. She just really doesn't care about the ACC, that's all there is to it.
 
Heather writes her blogs in a way that makes it seem like she hates her job and is just waiting for another to open. She went to a Big 10 school, I bet if she had that job the quality of her articles would increase 10 fold. She just really doesn't care about the ACC, that's all there is to it.
If the Big Eleven TV network came calling, she would be gone in a heartbeat.
 
Good one VT guy. I think your probably right. Maybe she didn't want to predict the second half to cover her ass.
 
Oh please oh please oh please!!:fingersx:
The only problem with that is that if they got someone interested in the ACC, they would most likely be extremely biased. Dinich is perfect for ESPN because she A) knows nothing about the subject matter and B) will act as a mouthpiece for this week's propaganda. If you get someone passionate about ACC football, they'd most likely be passionate about one team in particular. Dinich doesn't care one way or the other, and as a result, you don't see posts about Bobby Bowden's trip to Old Country Buffet to catch the early bird special or a weekly feature entitled "This week in thUggery", which are two things I would instantly implement if given the job. I would also not cover Duke football, because I'm not convinced it's real.
 
The only problem with that is that if they got someone interested in the ACC, they would most likely be extremely biased. Dinich is perfect for ESPN because she A) knows nothing about the subject matter and B) will act as a mouthpiece for this week's propaganda. If you get someone passionate about ACC football, they'd most likely be passionate about one team in particular. Dinich doesn't care one way or the other, and as a result, you don't see posts about Bobby Bowden's trip to Old Country Buffet to catch the early bird special or a weekly feature entitled "This week in thUggery", which are two things I would instantly implement if given the job. I would also not cover Duke football, because I'm not convinced it's real.

I don't want an ACC guy covering the ACC necessarily. What I want is someone who actually makes informed, UNBIASED, opinions. Heather's biggest problem is she gets pushed around by the ESECPN bias floating around, and then talks down on the ACC.

Even a couple of years ago when RichRod was at WVU and the big Least was making some noise (Rutgers, WVU, Cincy) she was badmouthing the ACC at the expense of the Big Least.

She picks a random conference and then talks about how great they are, and how terrible we are.

She's a joke.
 
Is Dinich really trying to show that she doesn't watch the games? Give me a break...it might be 17-14 after the FIRST quarter!! :wow:

Last year it was VT 20 GT 17. I think she just changed the score from last year a few points. It never occurred to her that high scoring offenses and GT problems on defense would make for a much higher scoring game. Then again, we'll all look stupid if she's right!
 
Is she thinking that VPI's defense is on par with our offense, and VPi's offense on par with our defense? That's the only way I can see this turning out to be a low scoring game, but I don't see how both teams' defenses will be able to hold the offenses to below twenty points.
 
Her shiny, massive forehead is though. I bet that thing can be used to signal passing airplanes in case of emergency.

I'm kidding, that's just plain mean. In all seriousness, she knows nothing about this thing called football.

She would fit in pretty well here (with the exception of a few).
 
Back
Top