The Jacket The Coat Joined Jun 17, 2002 Messages 33,554 Dec 5, 2008 #1 Dumb question maybe, but I'm drawing a blank.
ITJacket Jolly Good Fellow Joined Aug 28, 2007 Messages 1,945 Dec 5, 2008 #2 I don't think we have. I actually remember thinking that we'd probably line up in something else on the goal line, but I was surprised to see we lined up in the flex even then.
I don't think we have. I actually remember thinking that we'd probably line up in something else on the goal line, but I was surprised to see we lined up in the flex even then.
TechGator1066 Dodd-Like Joined Aug 16, 2006 Messages 6,624 Dec 5, 2008 #3 Sometimes I wish CPJ would throw in a wishbone package...just to shake things up a bit.
law_bee Dodd-Like Joined Nov 25, 2001 Messages 6,399 Dec 5, 2008 #4 actually once you put one guy in motion then it is an H-back formation and then sometimes we have multiple wideouts to one side. the formation is not the issue it is the plays that you run. It appears that CPJ can run ALL his plays out of that type of formation
actually once you put one guy in motion then it is an H-back formation and then sometimes we have multiple wideouts to one side. the formation is not the issue it is the plays that you run. It appears that CPJ can run ALL his plays out of that type of formation
JoltinJacket ► Ģŏ ʝąҁʞεɫʂ ◄ Joined Oct 30, 2002 Messages 10,740 Dec 5, 2008 #5 TechGator1066 said: Sometimes I wish CPJ would throw in a wishbone package...just to shake things up a bit. Click to expand... The classic T-formation FTMFW!
TechGator1066 said: Sometimes I wish CPJ would throw in a wishbone package...just to shake things up a bit. Click to expand... The classic T-formation FTMFW!
BarrelORum Mediocre Poster Joined Jul 24, 2002 Messages 16,274 Dec 5, 2008 #6 The veer. And the flexbone is not a package its a GD formation.