Durrrrrrrrrr

The Gus

The Gus

Banhammer'd
Ban Hammer'd
Joined
Dec 13, 2017
Messages
323
Because Tech has better golfers! Amazing, but true.

It is all about recruiting - Durrrrrrrrrrrr.

Tech is good in golf because it gets excellent golfers. If Tech recruited below average golfers - then the Golf Program would be below average. Like the Football Team. Durrrrrrrrrr.

Need a new Football coach who recruits better. Durrrrrrrrrrrr.

Maybe I should have titled this thread: Durrrrrrrrrr.
 
The Gus said:
Because Tech has better golfers! Amazing, but true.

It is all about recruiting - Durrrrrrrrrrrr.

Tech is good in golf because it gets excellent golfers. If Tech recruited below average golfers - then the Golf Program would be below average. Like the Football Team. Durrrrrrrrrr.

Need a new Football coach who recruits better. Durrrrrrrrrrrr.

Maybe I should have titled this thread: Durrrrrrrrrr.
Click to expand...

:bigcry:
 
The point of this thread is OBVIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF TECH WANTS TO WIN IN FOOTBALL LIKE GOLF - THEY NEED TO RECRUIT A WHOLE LOT BETTER. DURRRRRRRRRRR.
 
Or maybe we needed an AD who does their job to recruit better?

New locker rooms, Adidas, Tech Gold, additional recruiting staff hires. None of those are head coach things, they're AD things! But since we're dumb let's just put everything on the coach? If a coach doesn't win at Vandy they suck too?
 
Finding 5 golfers to show up and bring their own equipment is not quite the same as fielding a football team.
 
download (2).jpeg
 
RussianOffense said:
Or maybe we needed an AD who does their job to recruit better?

New locker rooms, Adidas, Tech Gold, additional recruiting staff hires. None of those are head coach things, they're AD things! But since we're dumb let's just put everything on the coach? If a coach doesn't win at Vandy they suck too?
Click to expand...

Yeah you're right. It's on Stansbury if he doesnt get rid of the coach who has 3 losing seasons in 4 years at the end of the season.
 
Lets see, is it easier to recruit rich, white country club kids who attend private schools to Tech or recruit lower income, public school athletes who arent attending college if it werent for an athletic scholarship?
 
TampaBayJacket said:
Lets see, is it easier to recruit rich, white country club kids who attend private schools to Tech or recruit lower income, public school athletes who arent attending college if it werent for an athletic scholarship?
Click to expand...

Yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top