Uncle Mike
Hell Yeah!
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2014
- Messages
- 344
This madness has to end...and mighty quick!
this nugget sums up NIL era (error) in a nutshell:
This madness has to end...and mighty quick!
that's because the wild west nature of this entire era. next they will be suing AD's and school Presidents.I thought NIL's were with the collectives, not the schools, so how is the coach liable for a third party not paying up?
That won’t happenthat's because the wild west nature of this entire era. next they will be suing AD's and school Presidents.
don't tell me that won't happen.
That is legitimately the most retarded way one could possibly interpret title ix. NIL is financial assistance?!? So, if Dr Pepper pays the Heisman frontrunner to appear in their commercials, the school is violating Title IX because their women's sports stars aren't as prestigious. That won't stand up to appeal.NIL is going to get interesting here soon.
Department Of Education Throws A Wrench Into NCAA Revenue Sharing Model With Title IX Rules Memo
This could possibly be changed or altered in some way when new leadership in the White House begins, but has thrown a wrench into some school's plans for revenue-sharing.www.outkick.com
I haven’t read that much about it yet, but I think it’s specifically calling out NIL money from the school to the student athlete. So your example wouldn’t be affected. I think it’s more about school-run NIL collectives.That is legitimately the most retarded way one could possibly interpret title ix. NIL is financial assistance?!? So, if Dr Pepper pays the Heisman frontrunner to appear in their commercials, the school is violating Title IX because their women's sports stars aren't as prestigious. That won't stand up to appeal.
This is it. Using school's NIL slush funds to be used equally Those grad student fees are about to see a 3000% increase....I haven’t read that much about it yet, but I think it’s specifically calling out NIL money from the school to the student athlete. So your example wouldn’t be affected. I think it’s more about school-run NIL collectives.
I called it...NIL is going to get interesting here soon.
Department Of Education Throws A Wrench Into NCAA Revenue Sharing Model With Title IX Rules Memo
This could possibly be changed or altered in some way when new leadership in the White House begins, but has thrown a wrench into some school's plans for revenue-sharing.www.outkick.com
I still don’t understand how this situation passes Title IX muster, especially once the schools start paying directly.
The schools do not pay NIL money. The collectives are a 'letter, but not intent, of the law' thing set up by boosters to meet the current rules meant to allow student athletes to accept endorsement deals, but instead use the fuzziness of that language to collectively endorse players as a fan base organization. The player's duties include meet and greets,etc.Does the school pay the NIL money? I thought it was "independent collectives" that would collect and distribute the money to players.
Isn't there some type of ruling now that the schools can give up to $20 million directly to athletes? I can see that as a title IX issue.The schools do not pay NIL money. The collectives are a 'letter, but not intent, of the law' thing set up by boosters to meet the current rules meant to allow student athletes to accept endorsement deals, but instead use the fuzziness of that language to collectively endorse players as a fan base organization. The player's duties include meet and greets,etc.
In a sense the collectives are a business set up to intentionally monetize the popularity of student-athletes in a revenue sharing model with those athletes. Of course, there's nothing preventing the athletes from accepting endorsements from other businesses on top of compensation they receive from the collectives. Either way, these are legal entities completely separate from the university and athletic departments.
Title IX does not have jurisdiction.
A little Google says yes. I missed that memo. I stand corrected.Isn't there some type of ruling now that the schools can give up to $20 million directly to athletes? I can see that as a title IX issue.