Here is a link (CLICK HERE) to a practice report by beej67.
It is the only practice that he has attended and his observations seem genuine; with less bias and/or sugar-coating than some other reports.
Interesting read.
EDITED COMMENT:
This post has nothing to do with GTTerrific. This is merely an informational link to a (in my opinion) quality practice report. No one is required to read it or comment on it.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Have you attended any practices? How do you know other reports are biased and sugar-coated? Is this another one of your little digs?
GTT, it's getting to be a shame that we can't all just hit DELETE when we see a post from Beeware. Of course we would but it wouldn't do any good. He's just a necessary evil a board like this has to have.
He's getting famous for looking a gift horse in the mouth though, and lately it seems the only time he opens his mouth is to switch feet!
Originally posted by beeware: Here is a link (CLICK HERE) to a practice report by beej67.
It is the only practice that he has attended and his observations seem genuine; with less bias and/or sugar-coating than some other reports.
Interesting read.
EDITED COMMENT:
This post has nothing to do with GTTerrific. This is merely an informational link to a (in my opinion) quality practice report. No one is required to read it or comment on it.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">I liked the report as well as I stated on the HIve before I saw the link here. It's great you linked it. Still want to know why you feel other reports are biased and/or sugar coated? What information do you have that gives you that opinion?
Originally posted by GTTerrific: </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Originally posted by beeware: Here is a link (CLICK HERE) to a practice report by beej67.
It is the only practice that he has attended and his observations seem genuine; with less bias and/or sugar-coating than some other reports.
Interesting read.GTT HE HAS NONE AS ALWAYS.
EDITED COMMENT:
This post has nothing to do with GTTerrific. This is merely an informational link to a (in my opinion) quality practice report. No one is required to read it or comment on it.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">I liked the report as well as I stated on the HIve before I saw the link here. It's great you linked it. Still want to know why you feel other reports are biased and/or sugar coated? What information do you have that gives you that opinion?</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">
Originally posted by GTTerrific: </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Originally posted by beeware: Here is a link (CLICK HERE) to a practice report by beej67.
It is the only practice that he has attended and his observations seem genuine; with less bias and/or sugar-coating than some other reports.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Have you attended any practices? How do you know other reports are biased and sugar-coated? Is this another one of your little digs?
</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">GTT, you are asking a trivial question.
Anything, i mean anything, that sheds a positive light on our coaching staff is biased and sugar-coated to beeware.
although i must say, this is the most naked that i have seen beeware. cover up dude! gross
