Good teams don't lose 4 in a row

[Ish]

fact.

 

[RamblinWreck09]

Mediocre teams...

...nevermind

 

[Diseqc]

fact.

I will agree. This is 100% indisputable fact.

 

[GruffyMcGuiness]

But do they lose FIVE in a row?

 

[DressCheeseSideSeaboard]

Good teams don't lose two in a row.

 

[coit]

Good teams don't lose.

meta fix

 

[Diseqc]

meta fix

That's great teams.

Although the current definition allows calling a 6-6 team "good" as long as they win every other game. So maybe it's a crappy definition anyways.

 

[coit]

That's great teams.

Although the current definition allows calling a 6-6 team "good" as long as they win every other game. So maybe it's a crappy definition anyways.

Do good teams lose to gooder teams?

 

[DressCheeseSideSeaboard]

That's great teams.

Although the current definition allows calling a 6-6 team "good" as long as they win every other game. So maybe it's a crappy definition anyways.

6-6 is bowl eligible.

 

[jdubjacket]

6-6 is bowl eligible.

Air Force is chomping at the bit to play us again. :turbonoes:

 

[DressCheeseSideSeaboard]

Do good teams lose to gooder teams?

SEC teams are gooder'n hell.

 

[coit]

SEC teams are gooder'n hell.

They got big ol' boys and some fast'uns too.

 

[Diseqc]

6-6 is bowl eligible.

Is bowl eligible your definition of good?

 

[AlaGold]

fact.

or THREE

 

[Allen Koholic]

Is bowl eligible your definition of good?

Yes, yes it is.

 

[05GTCorndog]

Possibly the best team to lose 4 in a row

 

[BLEEDGOLD]

Good teams don't lose two in a row.

Three in a row...not so good...four in a row...TERRIBLE OVERATED TEAM.

 

[andrew]

Good teams don't lose two in a row.

Has Paul Johnson ever had a good team at GT?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk

 

[Diseqc]

Has Paul Johnson ever had a good team at GT?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk

Asking the important questions.

 

[DressCheeseSideSeaboard]

Has Paul Johnson ever had a good team at GT?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G850A using Tapatalk

Yes. 2008.