SMoney
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
- Messages
- 3,047
"Chan Gailey says that if the offense doesn't improve, he is looking to take back over control of the playcalling"
Not sure exactly where they got the quote, but this has to be about the dumbest thing I have heard in a while. Chan won't let Bond do his own thing, our WR's can't catch balls that hit them in the numbers, but Gailey thows Bond under the bus and says he'll take back over playcalling? I HOPE the team comes out passing lights out so that Gailey never takes "full" control again. It's bad enough that he keeps his hand in the cookie jar all the time IMHO, but please let Bond do his thing! I have been neutral for a very long time in the "keep Chan/fire Chan" debate, but if he takes back over playcalling, I think it is going to make me decide once and for all...
Not sure exactly where they got the quote, but this has to be about the dumbest thing I have heard in a while. Chan won't let Bond do his own thing, our WR's can't catch balls that hit them in the numbers, but Gailey thows Bond under the bus and says he'll take back over playcalling? I HOPE the team comes out passing lights out so that Gailey never takes "full" control again. It's bad enough that he keeps his hand in the cookie jar all the time IMHO, but please let Bond do his thing! I have been neutral for a very long time in the "keep Chan/fire Chan" debate, but if he takes back over playcalling, I think it is going to make me decide once and for all...