How did Georgia Tech start winning with an interim coach? Brent Key is focusing on details (Athletic)

ricejacket

Damn Good Rat
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,498
By Andy Staples
3h ago
12
Brent Key was pulled out of an offensive game plan meeting on Oct. 4 and told to walk up the hill to Georgia Tech’s athletic administrative offices. When Key, the offensive line coach, got there, he learned head coach Geoff Collins had been fired. Key, a Georgia Tech graduate who started at guard all four years on The Flats, would be the head coach for the remainder of the season.
ADVERTISEMENT

As he walked back down the hill toward the football offices, Key, 42, immediately identified his first priority as the head coach of his alma mater. Before Key could even think about Georgia Tech beating an FBS opponent — something that hadn’t happened since a game at Duke nearly a year earlier — he had to fix one glaring issue. So he headed straight for the office of linebackers coach Jason Semore. Semore, known to his friends as Boogie, instantly knew what Key wanted to discuss.
Something had to be done about Georgia Tech’s punt protection.
The Yellow Jackets had four punts blocked in their first four games. A block two days earlier at UCF had been returned for a touchdown and erased a Georgia Tech lead just before halftime. Clemson had blocked two punts in the season opener. Ole Miss had blocked one near the start of a 42-0 blowout.
Of all the things Georgia Tech had done wrong over the course of a 1-3 start, punt protection was the most consistently bad.

But it didn’t have to be. Key determined to change it ahead of a game that Saturday at defending ACC champion Pittsburgh. So Key asked Semore a question that doubled as an assignment: “What’s the best thing we can do in four days to fix this problem?”
“He looked at me like I was crazy,” Key said.
Yet they pulled it off. That Saturday, all of Georgia Tech’s punts got away clean. There were no crushing momentum swings, and the Yellow Jackets stunned Pitt 26-21. The following week against Duke? Six more successful punts. (Though one wasn’t covered particularly well.) Georgia Tech won 23-20 in overtime.
Suddenly, the Yellow Jackets had won consecutive games for the first time since former coach Paul Johnson’s final season in 2018. Did they win those games because Key and Semore reconfigured the punt team? No. But they had a chance to win because Key identified a fatal flaw and Semore managed to fix it on a compressed timetable. With 10 days between the Duke game and Thursday’s visit from Virginia, Key hopes the Yellow Jackets can evolve more.
ADVERTISEMENT

The punt team issue is a prime example of what plagued Georgia Tech. While Key and everyone else remain complimentary of Collins, it’s clear finer details were getting missed. The reason Key chose Semore for the task of overhauling that group is that Semore is “a ball coach,” which is one of the highest compliments Key can give someone. “At the end of the day, that’s what we do,” Key said. “A lot of people get caught up so much in everything else that they lose sight of actual football.”
Semore quickly cobbled together a 160-play cut-up of various punt protections to try to determine how to fix Georgia Tech’s. Though Key and Semore didn’t reveal much schematically, the flaws in the old system are easy to spot on video.
The Yellow Jackets had made it incredibly easy for opponents to get to punter David Shanahan. The five blockers on the line of scrimmage were separated by wide splits, and the Yellow Jackets had only two personal protectors between the line of scrimmage and the punter. Opponents could overload one side and then send two rushers through the wide split and one to the outside. This would force a personal protector to make a choice to protect inside or outside. But if one rusher came off the line unblocked and another beat his blocker, the personal protector was guaranteed to be wrong. He’d block one rusher and the other would reach Shanahan.
Georgia Tech was trying to straddle the line between a Shield Punt, which places multiple players between the punter and the line of scrimmage, and the Pro Punt, which usually has one man between the line of scrimmage and the punter who is in charge of setting and changing the protection. The Pro Punt offers more flexibility in coverage, while the Shield offers more security for the punter. It was clear which direction the Yellow Jackets needed to shift.
The Yellow Jackets were living dangerously every time they punted, and the Ole Miss block drove that point home. “They were in punt safe,” Key said. “The d-end blocks a punt. He’s probably never blocked a punt in his life.” Ole Miss had only sent five rushers, but two Georgia Tech blockers had released to cover the kick. A personal protector picked up one of the inside rushers, but that left him occupied when the end man on the left side of the line of scrimmage let his rusher go free. Ole Miss defensive end Cedric Johnson got to Shanahan with so little resistance that it might have been easier to tackle Shanahan than block the kick.
ADVERTISEMENT

The problem with changing something as fundamental as punt protection is that teams spend an inordinate amount of offseason time installing it so they don’t have to spend as much of their precious practice time on it in season. “This is something normally people do over a nine-month period of time,” Key remembered thinking. “Offseason. Spring practice. Summertime. Preseason practice. We ain’t got that.” In creating that initial cut-up, Semore scoured different teams’ punt protection schemes looking for the least “expensive” in terms of time required to teach and rules that needed to be remembered by the players.
Semore presented several options, but most were a variation on a three-man shield, which utilized three personal protectors between the punter and the line of scrimmage. Key agreed that would be the easiest to teach in four days, and the coaches plowed ahead.
They did what they could with limited time in meetings and practice and loaded up on walkthroughs. When players might have been in their rooms watching movies on the morning of a night game, they were dodging raindrops in a chilly hotel parking lot pretending to block oncoming rushers. Key had thought about doing the walkthrough inside, but the forecast called for temperatures in the 50s and rain.
He thought of something former boss Nick Saban often said. “He got it from Bill Belichick,” Key said. “If you’re going to fight in the Baltics, you’ve got to train in the Baltics.”
The following day at Pitt, the Yellow Jackets drove for a field goal on their first possession. Their second went three-and-out and left them with fourth-and-11 from their own 36. The punt team lined up for its first kick with seven blockers in the box on the line of scrimmage and three personal protectors between the line and Shanahan. Semore, well aware that Pittsburgh coach Pat Narduzzi likes to be aggressive on special teams, expected the Panthers to come screaming after the kick. He inhaled deep and waited.
But before the ball could be snapped, a whistle blew. Officials wanted to check for targeting on the tackle on the previous play. After the review found no targeting, the Yellow Jackets lined up again. Semore looked out on the field again and sucked in another breath. “They’re 10-up,” Semore said. “And sure enough, they brought the house.”
But the rushers slammed into blockers, and Shanahan got the punt away clean. “Oh, thank God,” Semore remembered saying to himself. Meanwhile, Semore and Key shifted to a new concern. “Me and Boogie were together fretting and scared to death,” he said. “There was so much time spent on the protection part and not the coverage.”
The Yellow Jackets covered well against Pittsburgh. Against Duke, they allowed Sahmir Hagans to return a punt 81 yards for a touchdown to help the Blue Devils claw their way back and force overtime. But Georgia Tech only had so much time. Semore has had more since that game to clean up coverage issues.
 
Key and the staff remain focused on the details because that’s how Key was raised in the sport. He played for George O’Leary at Georgia Tech and worked for him at UCF. Then Key worked for Saban at Alabama for three seasons before joining Collins at Georgia Tech.
Key remembers as a young coach being asked by O’Leary to get on the board and write down the titles of all the officials along with each of their responsibilities. Coaches were expected to be able to draw a football field and include exact measurements for everything from the distance between the hash marks to the lengths of the hash marks. “You’re exposed to so much when you’re around guys like that,” Key said. “You don’t realize how much you’re learning about the game.”
Key has always kept a “running notebook” of ideas that he’d use if he had a chance to run his own program. Of course, most of those ideas are designed for a more traditional transfer of power. “I didn’t really take any notes on starting to do this on the Monday afternoon of a game week,” Key said. “It sneaks up on you.”
Key wants a chance to earn the job permanently, but he can’t think about that. New Georgia Tech athletic director J Batt arrived Monday and met with coaches. Key couldn’t be there because he had practice. At some point, he and Batt may talk about the possibility of Key taking over the program, but Key understands Batt’s job right now is to vet coaches and Key’s job is to try to put the best possible product on the field to state his case. Even if Batt chooses to hire from outside, a great run as the interim could vault Key into contention for other head coaching jobs.
Key also wants to make sure his players don’t believe winning is easy after doing it twice in a row. Though he doesn’t mind letting them enjoy the new vibe on campus.
“It’s been a while since we had this kind of momentum in the program,” tight end Dylan Leonard told reporters Monday. “It’s our first time with back-to-back wins. It’s great for us as players, but it’s also cool to see the fan base. You hear different conversations in the classroom. There’s a little more hype. It’s really cool walking around campus seeing people be excited about us.”
Semore worked as an analyst at Georgia Tech in 2019 and 2020 before going to Valdosta State last season to be the defensive coordinator. At the Division II powerhouse, Semore saw a team with a different attitude. The Blazers walk onto the field every week expecting to win. When Semore returned to Georgia Tech this season as the linebackers coach, the Yellow Jackets didn’t feel that way. But after consecutive wins, they are starting to develop that feeling. Semore couldn’t be happier for the veteran players he’s watched grow over the years.
“These guys that have been in the program that have been working their butts off to win have had hard times here,” Semore said. “I’m happy for them, but it’s also really neat to see the change in mindset for them. There are guys that believe that we’re a good football team right now. That goes a long way.”
Key just wants to make sure the players understand winning the last game guarantees nothing when it comes to the next. “Success,” he told them last week, “is the enemy of success.”
Collins’ biggest mistake might have been trying to brand the program before he could develop a brand on the field. Key doesn’t seem the least bit concerned about outside perception of the program. “If it doesn’t have to do with winning,” Leonard said, “he doesn’t care about it.”
Key cares about punt protection. But now that the Yellow Jackets have made strides there, he’s more worried about punt coverage.
And if Key and the Yellow Jackets keep worrying about the little things, they might keep making big strides. And Key might wind up with a much bigger job in 2023.
 
Meaning no disrespect to anybody, how could we have had a situation where everybody understood we were fundamentally unsound except our Head Coach and Athletic Director?
It's a really, really good question. I don't think there is any answer except both were so over their heads and had put our kids in such an impossible position to be successful, that everyone simply had no idea what exactly was wrong with the program except that everything had to change, which meant cleaning house. I'm glad Cabrera at least saw that and pulled the trigger.
 
Meaning no disrespect to anybody, how could we have had a situation where everybody understood we were fundamentally unsound except our Head Coach and Athletic Director?
I think there are a few things in play here.

When did 'everybody' know?

Cabrera arrived just as Collins first season of the greatest rebuild ever began.

Year 1 - The only people that might have had a clue were players and coaches. Who are they going to bring it up to? Not many more than 3 wins were expected by most.

Year 2 - COVID. Everybody gets a pass. No one outside players and coaches are still living the öööö show.

Year 3 - Close loss to NIU, other people start to question, but we're 2-2 after a winnable loss to #6 Clemson and a win over #20 UNC. Nobody knows at that point that those two teams down. A blowout to Pitt (but they're good) and a win at Duke puts us at 3-3 exactly a year ago. Then, the wheels come off with 6 straight losses and everyone is under a microscope.

End of the year, people are raising hell. This is when everyone knew to the point of voicing it. Cabrera was already pissed at Todd over the messes he made with OSU buyout, men's and women's basketball (FWIW, Nell Fortner was not Todd's hire, it was Rountree's. Todd owns the lawsuit, and he was warned by many long before about the issues in the administration he was inheriting), etc. Todd throws his lot in with Collins and his stupid contract. It's his last shot. Cabrera wasn't going to let Todd hire the next HC, but he was hoping to limp through another season of the contract. Todd doubled down by giving Danny Hall and his staff the new contracts. Then, we open 1-3 and they're both gone.

Now, word is coming out, veiled and slowly, about what was going on.
 
I think there are a few things in play here.

When did 'everybody' know?

Cabrera arrived just as Collins first season of the greatest rebuild ever began.

Year 1 - The only people that might have had a clue were players and coaches. Who are they going to bring it up to? Not many more than 3 wins were expected by most.

Year 2 - COVID. Everybody gets a pass. No one outside players and coaches are still living the öööö show.

Year 3 - Close loss to NIU, other people start to question, but we're 2-2 after a winnable loss to #6 Clemson and a win over #20 UNC. Nobody knows at that point that those two teams down. A blowout to Pitt (but they're good) and a win at Duke puts us at 3-3 exactly a year ago. Then, the wheels come off with 6 straight losses and everyone is under a microscope.

End of the year, people are raising hell. This is when everyone knew to the point of voicing it. Cabrera was already pissed at Todd over the messes he made with OSU buyout, men's and women's basketball (FWIW, Nell Fortner was not Todd's hire, it was Rountree's. Todd owns the lawsuit, and he was warned by many long before about the issues in the administration he was inheriting), etc. Todd throws his lot in with Collins and his stupid contract. It's his last shot. Cabrera wasn't going to let Todd hire the next HC, but he was hoping to limp through another season of the contract. Todd doubled down by giving Danny Hall and his staff the new contracts. Then, we open 1-3 and they're both gone.

Now, word is coming out, veiled and slowly, about what was going on.
Fantastic analysis. I guess what is most disappointing to me is how bad of an AD Stansbury turned out to be. It's not like we took a guy with zero admin experience and made him AD because he used to play football. He had a legit resume and the connections to GT just made it seem all the better.

My first disappointment with him came when he didn't fire Pastner for cause when we clearly had the opportunity. It was clear to me then and now that he is not going to have any level of success at GT. He couldn't win at Memphis where they literally only care about winning in basketball, so he's not going to win here, fluke ACC tourney aside.

But then that contract for Collins. I immediately jumped on the 7 year contract, that is simply way too long especially when the candidate you hired calls this his dream job and likely would have crawled here. But then we find out now that the contract wasn't 7 years that ended with the football season but instead ended with the calendar year? If no other school does that, why would we? Just looks totally incompetent. Of course after we hired him from OrSU we learn he has a mess there and then use GT funds to help him clean it up. Just disappointing all around.

I will also say I'm not 100% convinced J Batt will be the right guy. I've watched UT hire two "fundraiser" AD's and then a former football coach. None of them worked and to me the best way to fundraise is to win and you need an AD who can identify ways to build successful programs. Maybe Batt is the guy, maybe not. But it was clear Stansbury had to go for creating such a mess.
 
I guess what is most disappointing to me is how bad of an AD Stansbury turned out to be.
What is even more disappointing to me is that he met with a number of people with tangential and/or direct connections - donors, alumni, students, faculty, etc. - who gave him consistent opinions and advice on what needed to be corrected/improved. It's like he wrote it all down and did the exact opposite to spite everyone. That was confusing as hell. His vision for the AA was scarily parallel to Collins' approach to building a football program. In retrospect, that is not surprising.
 
I think there are a few things in play here.

When did 'everybody' know?

Cabrera arrived just as Collins first season of the greatest rebuild ever began.

Year 1 - The only people that might have had a clue were players and coaches. Who are they going to bring it up to? Not many more than 3 wins were expected by most.

Year 2 - COVID. Everybody gets a pass. No one outside players and coaches are still living the öööö show.

Year 3 - Close loss to NIU, other people start to question, but we're 2-2 after a winnable loss to #6 Clemson and a win over #20 UNC. Nobody knows at that point that those two teams down. A blowout to Pitt (but they're good) and a win at Duke puts us at 3-3 exactly a year ago. Then, the wheels come off with 6 straight losses and everyone is under a microscope.

End of the year, people are raising hell. This is when everyone knew to the point of voicing it. Cabrera was already pissed at Todd over the messes he made with OSU buyout, men's and women's basketball (FWIW, Nell Fortner was not Todd's hire, it was Rountree's. Todd owns the lawsuit, and he was warned by many long before about the issues in the administration he was inheriting), etc. Todd throws his lot in with Collins and his stupid contract. It's his last shot. Cabrera wasn't going to let Todd hire the next HC, but he was hoping to limp through another season of the contract. Todd doubled down by giving Danny Hall and his staff the new contracts. Then, we open 1-3 and they're both gone.

Now, word is coming out, veiled and slowly, about what was going on.
My statement to a friend immediately after the Citadel game:
"The Collins era is over. The best we can hope for is that it turns the roster over and sets the next guy up for success."

I was on the fire bandwagon after covid year. My ire ratcheted down after UNC last year, but had stopped watching the games after the first half of the Pitt game and went to watching replays instead.
 
My statement to a friend immediately after the Citadel game:
"The Collins era is over. The best we can hope for is that it turns the roster over and sets the next guy up for success."

The Citadel loss was bad, really bad. But the main thing I remember is that we didn't lose just because of bad play. But bad coaching and clock management. I don't remember exactly what happened but I do remember thinking that Collins must have been nervous or something to make such an error. Turns out nope, he really was just a terrible head coach!
 
I was one of those optimists who thought we would see improvement in the offseason with all the coaching changes. Was willing to wait and see. But Collins totally lost me at the end of the first half of the Clemson game where he chose to take a penalty to run out the clock rather than try to score. His loser mentality really shined through.

Key has some things to learn with game management, but so far he hasn't displayed a loser mentality. Will really find out when we play the Mutts, I guess.
 
The Citadel loss was bad, really bad. But the main thing I remember is that we didn't lose just because of bad play. But bad coaching and clock management. I don't remember exactly what happened but I do remember thinking that Collins must have been nervous or something to make such an error. Turns out nope, he really was just a terrible head coach!
Late in the game Oliver ran for a TD but the bench (Collins) had called a TO because he thought the Play Clock was going to run out.

Maybe the Citadel let up on the play but it sure didn’t look like it. The TO gave the defense a chance to rest and collect themself.
 
The Citadel loss was bad, really bad. But the main thing I remember is that we didn't lose just because of bad play. But bad coaching and clock management. I don't remember exactly what happened but I do remember thinking that Collins must have been nervous or something to make such an error. Turns out nope, he really was just a terrible head coach!
For me, this became apparent in the NIU game when he clearly changed a decision due to the crowd reaction. 4th down, was going to punt, the boo birds came out by all of us, he calls time out and then goes for it, but with either just a bad play call or poor execution by Sims (or both) and we turn over on downs. That was the epiphany moment that he doesn’t know what he’s doing.
 
I think there are a few things in play here.

When did 'everybody' know?

Cabrera arrived just as Collins first season of the greatest rebuild ever began.

Year 1 - The only people that might have had a clue were players and coaches. Who are they going to bring it up to? Not many more than 3 wins were expected by most.

Year 2 - COVID. Everybody gets a pass. No one outside players and coaches are still living the öööö show.

Year 3 - Close loss to NIU, other people start to question, but we're 2-2 after a winnable loss to #6 Clemson and a win over #20 UNC. Nobody knows at that point that those two teams down. A blowout to Pitt (but they're good) and a win at Duke puts us at 3-3 exactly a year ago. Then, the wheels come off with 6 straight losses and everyone is under a microscope.

End of the year, people are raising hell. This is when everyone knew to the point of voicing it. Cabrera was already pissed at Todd over the messes he made with OSU buyout, men's and women's basketball (FWIW, Nell Fortner was not Todd's hire, it was Rountree's. Todd owns the lawsuit, and he was warned by many long before about the issues in the administration he was inheriting), etc. Todd throws his lot in with Collins and his stupid contract. It's his last shot. Cabrera wasn't going to let Todd hire the next HC, but he was hoping to limp through another season of the contract. Todd doubled down by giving Danny Hall and his staff the new contracts. Then, we open 1-3 and they're both gone.

Now, word is coming out, veiled and slowly, about what was going on.
I thank God for those blocked punts. Nothing could ever so obviously damn the Collins era as those futile punts. Everything going on was neatly wrapped up in those 4 disastrous plays. Silver linings...
 
By Andy Staples
3h ago
12
Brent Key was pulled out of an offensive game plan meeting on Oct. 4 and told to walk up the hill to Georgia Tech’s athletic administrative offices. When Key, the offensive line coach, got there, he learned head coach Geoff Collins had been fired. Key, a Georgia Tech graduate who started at guard all four years on The Flats, would be the head coach for the remainder of the season.
ADVERTISEMENT

As he walked back down the hill toward the football offices, Key, 42, immediately identified his first priority as the head coach of his alma mater. Before Key could even think about Georgia Tech beating an FBS opponent — something that hadn’t happened since a game at Duke nearly a year earlier — he had to fix one glaring issue. So he headed straight for the office of linebackers coach Jason Semore. Semore, known to his friends as Boogie, instantly knew what Key wanted to discuss.
Something had to be done about Georgia Tech’s punt protection.
The Yellow Jackets had four punts blocked in their first four games. A block two days earlier at UCF had been returned for a touchdown and erased a Georgia Tech lead just before halftime. Clemson had blocked two punts in the season opener. Ole Miss had blocked one near the start of a 42-0 blowout.
Of all the things Georgia Tech had done wrong over the course of a 1-3 start, punt protection was the most consistently bad.

But it didn’t have to be. Key determined to change it ahead of a game that Saturday at defending ACC champion Pittsburgh. So Key asked Semore a question that doubled as an assignment: “What’s the best thing we can do in four days to fix this problem?”
“He looked at me like I was crazy,” Key said.
Yet they pulled it off. That Saturday, all of Georgia Tech’s punts got away clean. There were no crushing momentum swings, and the Yellow Jackets stunned Pitt 26-21. The following week against Duke? Six more successful punts. (Though one wasn’t covered particularly well.) Georgia Tech won 23-20 in overtime.
Suddenly, the Yellow Jackets had won consecutive games for the first time since former coach Paul Johnson’s final season in 2018. Did they win those games because Key and Semore reconfigured the punt team? No. But they had a chance to win because Key identified a fatal flaw and Semore managed to fix it on a compressed timetable. With 10 days between the Duke game and Thursday’s visit from Virginia, Key hopes the Yellow Jackets can evolve more.
ADVERTISEMENT

The punt team issue is a prime example of what plagued Georgia Tech. While Key and everyone else remain complimentary of Collins, it’s clear finer details were getting missed. The reason Key chose Semore for the task of overhauling that group is that Semore is “a ball coach,” which is one of the highest compliments Key can give someone. “At the end of the day, that’s what we do,” Key said. “A lot of people get caught up so much in everything else that they lose sight of actual football.”
Semore quickly cobbled together a 160-play cut-up of various punt protections to try to determine how to fix Georgia Tech’s. Though Key and Semore didn’t reveal much schematically, the flaws in the old system are easy to spot on video.
The Yellow Jackets had made it incredibly easy for opponents to get to punter David Shanahan. The five blockers on the line of scrimmage were separated by wide splits, and the Yellow Jackets had only two personal protectors between the line of scrimmage and the punter. Opponents could overload one side and then send two rushers through the wide split and one to the outside. This would force a personal protector to make a choice to protect inside or outside. But if one rusher came off the line unblocked and another beat his blocker, the personal protector was guaranteed to be wrong. He’d block one rusher and the other would reach Shanahan.
Georgia Tech was trying to straddle the line between a Shield Punt, which places multiple players between the punter and the line of scrimmage, and the Pro Punt, which usually has one man between the line of scrimmage and the punter who is in charge of setting and changing the protection. The Pro Punt offers more flexibility in coverage, while the Shield offers more security for the punter. It was clear which direction the Yellow Jackets needed to shift.
The Yellow Jackets were living dangerously every time they punted, and the Ole Miss block drove that point home. “They were in punt safe,” Key said. “The d-end blocks a punt. He’s probably never blocked a punt in his life.” Ole Miss had only sent five rushers, but two Georgia Tech blockers had released to cover the kick. A personal protector picked up one of the inside rushers, but that left him occupied when the end man on the left side of the line of scrimmage let his rusher go free. Ole Miss defensive end Cedric Johnson got to Shanahan with so little resistance that it might have been easier to tackle Shanahan than block the kick.
ADVERTISEMENT

The problem with changing something as fundamental as punt protection is that teams spend an inordinate amount of offseason time installing it so they don’t have to spend as much of their precious practice time on it in season. “This is something normally people do over a nine-month period of time,” Key remembered thinking. “Offseason. Spring practice. Summertime. Preseason practice. We ain’t got that.” In creating that initial cut-up, Semore scoured different teams’ punt protection schemes looking for the least “expensive” in terms of time required to teach and rules that needed to be remembered by the players.
Semore presented several options, but most were a variation on a three-man shield, which utilized three personal protectors between the punter and the line of scrimmage. Key agreed that would be the easiest to teach in four days, and the coaches plowed ahead.
They did what they could with limited time in meetings and practice and loaded up on walkthroughs. When players might have been in their rooms watching movies on the morning of a night game, they were dodging raindrops in a chilly hotel parking lot pretending to block oncoming rushers. Key had thought about doing the walkthrough inside, but the forecast called for temperatures in the 50s and rain.
He thought of something former boss Nick Saban often said. “He got it from Bill Belichick,” Key said. “If you’re going to fight in the Baltics, you’ve got to train in the Baltics.”
The following day at Pitt, the Yellow Jackets drove for a field goal on their first possession. Their second went three-and-out and left them with fourth-and-11 from their own 36. The punt team lined up for its first kick with seven blockers in the box on the line of scrimmage and three personal protectors between the line and Shanahan. Semore, well aware that Pittsburgh coach Pat Narduzzi likes to be aggressive on special teams, expected the Panthers to come screaming after the kick. He inhaled deep and waited.
But before the ball could be snapped, a whistle blew. Officials wanted to check for targeting on the tackle on the previous play. After the review found no targeting, the Yellow Jackets lined up again. Semore looked out on the field again and sucked in another breath. “They’re 10-up,” Semore said. “And sure enough, they brought the house.”
But the rushers slammed into blockers, and Shanahan got the punt away clean. “Oh, thank God,” Semore remembered saying to himself. Meanwhile, Semore and Key shifted to a new concern. “Me and Boogie were together fretting and scared to death,” he said. “There was so much time spent on the protection part and not the coverage.”
The Yellow Jackets covered well against Pittsburgh. Against Duke, they allowed Sahmir Hagans to return a punt 81 yards for a touchdown to help the Blue Devils claw their way back and force overtime. But Georgia Tech only had so much time. Semore has had more since that game to clean up coverage issues.
Andy Staples has probably the best college football podcast running 5+ days a week of all of them. Take out the stupid "I can eat $28 worth of Taco Bell" challenges, and this guy really knows his college football.
 
I thank God for those blocked punts. Nothing could ever so obviously damn the Collins era as those futile punts. Everything going on was neatly wrapped up in those 4 disastrous plays. Silver linings...
I was low on Collins from day one and was willing to be patient, understood the financial concerns, etc, but there was something about that last blocked punt against UCF. The collective unconscious knew it was 100% over after that one play.
 
Fantastic analysis. I guess what is most disappointing to me is how bad of an AD Stansbury turned out to be. It's not like we took a guy with zero admin experience and made him AD because he used to play football. He had a legit resume and the connections to GT just made it seem all the better.

My first disappointment with him came when he didn't fire Pastner for cause when we clearly had the opportunity. It was clear to me then and now that he is not going to have any level of success at GT. He couldn't win at Memphis where they literally only care about winning in basketball, so he's not going to win here, fluke ACC tourney aside.

But then that contract for Collins. I immediately jumped on the 7 year contract, that is simply way too long especially when the candidate you hired calls this his dream job and likely would have crawled here. But then we find out now that the contract wasn't 7 years that ended with the football season but instead ended with the calendar year? If no other school does that, why would we? Just looks totally incompetent. Of course after we hired him from OrSU we learn he has a mess there and then use GT funds to help him clean it up. Just disappointing all around.

I will also say I'm not 100% convinced J Batt will be the right guy. I've watched UT hire two "fundraiser" AD's and then a former football coach. None of them worked and to me the best way to fundraise is to win and you need an AD who can identify ways to build successful programs. Maybe Batt is the guy, maybe not. But it was clear Stansbury had to go for creating such a mess.
I like your comment about Pastner.This season will show AGAIN that his program is going nowhere fast.
 
Back
Top