How many of our starters would make the thee-deep at UGA?

TampaBayJacket

Dodd-Like
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Messages
4,261
Discuss. This is relevant in that I'm still butthurt and negative on this monday. I say Gray would be three deep at UGA. Not much else?
 
Going at least three deep in your mom, if she's lucky she'll get the other half-inch.

Dumb question really, but to answer it assuming we’re running their scheme...

Offense:
Jeune would start. Stewart would play. Their WRs are terrible.
Braun would start easily. Our OL would outnumber theirs in the 2-deep.
None of our RBs would play as they’re loaded there.
Obviously Marshall wouldn’t be running that offense.

Defense:
Simmons would play. They’re really talented on the DL though. Not sure anybody else would. Maybe Branch.
Mitchell would play but wouldn’t start.
Gray/Austins/Durham would all be in the mix to start.

Basically they’re stacked at RB/DL/LB, average at OL/DB, and lacking at QB/WR. And to be honest that kind of plays into us as we can neutralize stud DLs with our offense and I’m assuming we’re gonna load the box and force Fromm to beat us though the air.

Also, looking at it the other way - they wouldn’t have a ton of offensive players starting for us either. I could see all three RB spots and maybe 1 OL starting for us.
 
Dumb question really, but to answer it assuming we’re running their scheme...

Offense:

Gray/Austins/Durham would all be in the mix to start.
.
Gray would be in the mix to start, but not the other guys, no way. The Austin twins and Step are average IMO, and UGA's DB's are much better. Gray is a baller though.
 
what%2Bdifference.gif


We've heard all this before. We know the deal.
 
Last edited:
Georgia is lacking at QB? Huh?

As long as they keep starting true frosh, yes. No matter how high they were ranked in HS. Our secondary can match up with their receivers. Load the box and see if Fromm can do any better against us than Eason did last year.
 
Is a thee-deep some sort of Shakespearean depth chart? But lo, what back through yonder DL breaks? It is the B-back, and Kirvonte Benson is the playbook.
"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless fanbase!" — King Lear, act 1, scene 4
"Frailty, they name is o-line." — Hamlet, act 1, scene 2
"I am one who play-called not wisely but too well." — Othello, act 5, scene 2
"The Beamer doth protest too much, methinks." — Hamlet, act 3, scene 2
 
"How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is to have a thankless fanbase!" — King Lear, act 1, scene 4
"Frailty, they name is o-line." — Hamlet, act 1, scene 2
"I am one who play-called not wisely but too well." — Othello, act 5, scene 2
"The Beamer doth protest too much, methinks." — Hamlet, act 3, scene 2
I like it....

For all those who say we have no chance:

Truth’s a dog must to kennel; he must be whipp’d out…
-King Lear, I.4.640
 
Dumb question really, but to answer it assuming we’re running their scheme...

Offense:
Jeune would start. Stewart would play. Their WRs are terrible.
Braun would start easily. Our OL would outnumber theirs in the 2-deep.
None of our RBs would play as they’re loaded there.
Obviously Marshall wouldn’t be running that offense.

Defense:
Simmons would play. They’re really talented on the DL though. Not sure anybody else would. Maybe Branch.
Mitchell would play but wouldn’t start.
Gray/Austins/Durham would all be in the mix to start.

Basically they’re stacked at RB/DL/LB, average at OL/DB, and lacking at QB/WR. And to be honest that kind of plays into us as we can neutralize stud DLs with our offense and I’m assuming we’re gonna load the box and force Fromm to beat us though the air.

Also, looking at it the other way - they wouldn’t have a ton of offensive players starting for us either. I could see all three RB spots and maybe 1 OL starting for us.
Mostly agree, but I think Griffin would play a lot, not Durham so much. Also think Searcy would get a lot of action at receiver or as a DB.
 
Back
Top