WracerX
Dr. Dunkingstein
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2004
- Messages
- 25,591
Of the choices for head coach, there is my guy and then a bunch of no-talent ass-clowns. Why is this process taking so long?
Seriously though, we have a pretty good selection of candidates.
RN - has won Big 12 and PAC-10 championships. He has probably the strongest I-A track record of the group. His run ins with the NCAA are troubling. But he is the only coach I can think of that sued the NCAA and won in court.
PJ - stellar I-AA track record. Solid showing at Navy. A lot of people don't want to see the triple O. He would tweak his O to fit our talent level just like Grobe did at Wake as his recruits started to come in. The biggest drawback to PJ is his price tag. I am not sure we can handle an extra 1million/yr over the next few years.
WM - Obviously a motivator. He has spent time learning from two very successful head coaches. He should have the contacts to put together a top notch staff. Hopefully, TT has taught him the importance of beating your employers rivals. His biggest drawback is that he has zero head coaching experience. There is only one way to know if he can handle the big chair.
CH - Head coach experience. He runs an exciting offense, which like PJ, he is able to tweak to his personnel. He would possible pull in more interest for Tech in south GA, at least for a year or two (more if he wins). His biggest drawback is that he doesn't have I-A experience. Does he have the contacts to put together a good staff?
JT - great defenses at Tech. I have no idea what kind of offense he will install. Typically, DC's install whatever offense works the best against THEIR defense. So I would expect to see an emphisis on the TE in his offense (quick short passes). His issue seems to be if he can work with the press. And more importantly, how is his relationship with his staff?
Seriously though, we have a pretty good selection of candidates.
RN - has won Big 12 and PAC-10 championships. He has probably the strongest I-A track record of the group. His run ins with the NCAA are troubling. But he is the only coach I can think of that sued the NCAA and won in court.
PJ - stellar I-AA track record. Solid showing at Navy. A lot of people don't want to see the triple O. He would tweak his O to fit our talent level just like Grobe did at Wake as his recruits started to come in. The biggest drawback to PJ is his price tag. I am not sure we can handle an extra 1million/yr over the next few years.
WM - Obviously a motivator. He has spent time learning from two very successful head coaches. He should have the contacts to put together a top notch staff. Hopefully, TT has taught him the importance of beating your employers rivals. His biggest drawback is that he has zero head coaching experience. There is only one way to know if he can handle the big chair.
CH - Head coach experience. He runs an exciting offense, which like PJ, he is able to tweak to his personnel. He would possible pull in more interest for Tech in south GA, at least for a year or two (more if he wins). His biggest drawback is that he doesn't have I-A experience. Does he have the contacts to put together a good staff?
JT - great defenses at Tech. I have no idea what kind of offense he will install. Typically, DC's install whatever offense works the best against THEIR defense. So I would expect to see an emphisis on the TE in his offense (quick short passes). His issue seems to be if he can work with the press. And more importantly, how is his relationship with his staff?
