interesting thread about GT on Miami's board...

Because they did everything last season to prove that they were ready to beat us...
 
ha...that's funny. maybe they learned how to tackle and play assignment football this offseason...and figured out what offense means...and got a real coach...who's he kidding?
 
My biggest worry is that Leach from TT will eventually end up at Miami. I don't want to face that offense with south Florida speed.
 
UM fans are probably feeling a little more confident since their offense for '09 will be de-Nixified.
 
UM fans are probably feeling a little more confident since their offense for '09 will be de-Nixified.

That alone will make them better and more dangerous than many are apparently expecting. I still say we win, but it will be close.
 
in Austrian German slang "nix" is a shortened version of "nichts" which means "nothing"

so appropriate
 
Fun thread.

Who knew we had more than a quarter of a mile of rushing against Miami? I didn't, until I ran the numbers.
 
Technically correct is the best kind of correct.

The best kind of correct is to be technically as well as philosophically correct.

As an example I cite the former and current drugs in the bloodstream laws of Georgia as related to DUI. In the old law, having any amount of THC in your system would result in a DUI conviction based on a technically correct interpretation that any amount of THC in your bloodstream shows the presence of a drug in your bloodstream and therefor you are 'under the influence'. Forget the fact that THC stays in your blood and fatty tissue for about 2-3 weeks or longer, and obviously someone could be not really under the influence and still get a DUI. Now, the law has been changed to allow for expert testimony as to the relevance of the amount of THC in your bloodstream and how that relates to intoxication, in other words a philosophically correct interpretation of the DUI laws which assume that your driving is actually affected, not just your chemical system.

there, i corrected you
 
Back
Top