GTCrew
Patrick Henry
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2002
- Messages
- 49,807
It\'s tough to come on here and listen to whiners
from every side. But I have a lot of disjointed points to make.
#0. Do y'all really think the academic restrictions on Football Recruits are imaginary?
#1. We do not have the 'rivals' talent of our opponents. On the other hand, other than OL and TE(one of our best average star positions) I don't think we are outclassed in the ACC. And the OL is really showing potential.
#2. We are 'average' in a great conference. I would've loved to beat State and be 5-3 in conference, but we'd still be 'average' in my mind.
#3. When the ACC expanded, everyone wanted Miami, VT and another powerhouse. BC being the best available. When that happened, the paradigm shifted. Eight win seasons clearly will be much harder. I'll bet Fridge never wins ten again. Fidge and BigBee took advantage of weak schedules. It is like WVU in the Big East. Do you really think they would be above 500 in the ACC?
#4. We seem to be the least happy of all the 'average' ACC team fan bases. That includes Clemson, UVA, State, UNC, MD, and BC. None of them are seriously talking about coaching change and none of them will be better than 7-4. I have a strong feeling that the first average team to 'crack' and fire their coach will drop like a brick to the ACC cellar. Some of y'all are more positive. I think the ADs and prominent alumni at all those schools would err on the side of my opinion. I guess we all like mediocrity.
#12. I think we will have to reconsider playing Auburn/Notre Dame/Alabama caliber opponents if the fan base is going to freak out when we end up 6-5. Sure we have done well against Auburn. If UNC played pansies OOC they would have some impressive records.
from every side. But I have a lot of disjointed points to make.
#0. Do y'all really think the academic restrictions on Football Recruits are imaginary?
#1. We do not have the 'rivals' talent of our opponents. On the other hand, other than OL and TE(one of our best average star positions) I don't think we are outclassed in the ACC. And the OL is really showing potential.
#2. We are 'average' in a great conference. I would've loved to beat State and be 5-3 in conference, but we'd still be 'average' in my mind.
#3. When the ACC expanded, everyone wanted Miami, VT and another powerhouse. BC being the best available. When that happened, the paradigm shifted. Eight win seasons clearly will be much harder. I'll bet Fridge never wins ten again. Fidge and BigBee took advantage of weak schedules. It is like WVU in the Big East. Do you really think they would be above 500 in the ACC?
#4. We seem to be the least happy of all the 'average' ACC team fan bases. That includes Clemson, UVA, State, UNC, MD, and BC. None of them are seriously talking about coaching change and none of them will be better than 7-4. I have a strong feeling that the first average team to 'crack' and fire their coach will drop like a brick to the ACC cellar. Some of y'all are more positive. I think the ADs and prominent alumni at all those schools would err on the side of my opinion. I guess we all like mediocrity.
#12. I think we will have to reconsider playing Auburn/Notre Dame/Alabama caliber opponents if the fan base is going to freak out when we end up 6-5. Sure we have done well against Auburn. If UNC played pansies OOC they would have some impressive records.