Replay continues to frustrate me.
Was there irrefutable evidence that Clemson had possession of the fumble before entering the endzone? Of course not, as TV commentators all agreed.
So, refs claim irrefutable evidence that no one else viewing agrees with, takes two points off the board for Maryland, gives Clemson the ball instead of a having to kick from the 20, and CU hits a long pass.
The ACC is trying to keep some national interest in their championship game by keeping Clemson alive. That is the only irrefutable evidence in this game.
Here's hoping the Terps can still pull this out.