New CFP Alignment in 2026

Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
5,061
The only way to combat this is for the ACC and Big12 to start winning CFP championships, defeating SEC and BIG teams in the process.

Do this for a few years then turn the tide, “WE demand 4 team each.” The CFP will then be expanded again.
 
They are going to have to cut back to 11 games and expand the playoffs to 16 teams. Either lose 1 regular season game or play 12 and get rid of conference championships. Everyone is just shooting for the playoffs then. What a screwed up mess the NCAA has become.
Just go to year-round "college" football. Espn approves
 

I guess it's official now: the SEC and Big 10 are OFFICIALLY trying to take over college athletics.

4 teams each from the SEC and Big 10 and only 2 from the ACC and Big 12?
HELL NO !!!
At this point, my primary concern is being one of the 2 from the ACC.

I could say a lot more but we all know why we are in this position.
 
At this point, my primary concern is being one of the 2 from the ACC.

I could say a lot more but we all know why we are in this position.
Agreed. And honestly, 2 from the ACC vs 4 from the SEC feels about right if you've watched football the last 20 years.
 
Here's an idea:

All conferences select two All-Star teams, A and B. After the season (without the players leaving via graduation or going pro or transferring), these teams then play "round robin" home and away games. This creates a hierarchy of the conferences which determines how many from each team get into the playoffs.

Plus, more games!!
 
Here's an idea:

All conferences select two All-Star teams, A and B. After the season (without the players leaving via graduation or going pro or transferring), these teams then play "round robin" home and away games. This creates a hierarchy of the conferences which determines how many from each team get into the playoffs.

Plus, more games!!

That would be a lot of football on those bodles. Not sure the kids could hold up well under that much pounding.
 
Ok I’m crazy so here goes.
The ACC, Big 12 and others tell the SEC and Big 10 to go F their self. Then do what the old NFL and AFL did. Let the SEC and Big 10 have a playoff ( but don’t schedule a game with them, let them play all conference games or only schedule each other. )
Then let the Big12 ACC and others have a playoff.
Then after the two have their championship champ let them play one game ( the USA championship game)
Like I said I’m crazy.
 
This is glorious. I can't wait to see how this sh*t bomb blows up.

ESPN/Disney, the conference power brokers and the schools themselves have destroyed college athletics. People will eventually stop tuning in.
 
Ok I’m crazy so here goes.
The ACC, Big 12 and others tell the SEC and Big 10 to go F their self. Then do what the old NFL and AFL did. Let the SEC and Big 10 have a playoff ( but don’t schedule a game with them, let them play all conference games or only schedule each other. )
Then let the Big12 ACC and others have a playoff.
Then after the two have their championship champ let them play one game ( the USA championship game)
Like I said I’m crazy.
I am of the exact same mind. **** 'em all.
 
More info on this ---

SEC pushes CFP change, but not so fast

Greg Sankey enjoys philosophical musings. I wonder whether the SEC commissioner knows this one: You slurp what you crumble.

Or, what about this one? Self-made problems become the toughest to solve.

Sankey wants to reconfigure the 12team College Football Playoff, which he helped create, after just one season.

Sankey’s modification wish list includes stripping away protection of first-round playoff byes for conference champions.

In such a universe, first-round byes would go to the top four teams in the final College Football Playoff committee rankings, with no built-in protections for conference champions. In theory, then, all four byes could go to teams from the same conference – say, Sankey’s SEC.

Sankey says this change became necessary because conference affiliation no longer looks how it did when commissioners, including Sankey, devised the 12-team playoff format.

Hmm, I wonder why conference alignment changed.

Ah, yes, it changed after Sankey steered the SEC’s plunder of Texas and Oklahoma, the Big 12’s top brands. The SEC's heist started the realignment carousel’s ignition, and then the Big Ten sprang into action and raided the


west coast. In turn, the Big 12 and ACC shopped the Pac-12’s discount rack, and that conference became an unrecognizable husk.

“It’s not the same reality that existed when the 12-team model developed, and I’ve opined what I believe is the need to adjust,” Sankey said on “The Paul Finebaum Show” last week.

“And, the seeding issues, particularly moving teams into the top four, need to be looked at deeply.”

Let’s not forget, Sankey already engineered a change to the 12-team playoff before its launch. Originally, the playoff had been devised for six automatic bids and six at-large bids. After the Pac-12 buckled, Sankey successfully spearheaded the switch to five automatic bids and seven at-large berths.

His latest effort to bend the bracket to the SEC's desires encounters a roadblock, though.

Changing the playoff before next season would require unanimous approval from the other conference commissioners, plus Notre Dame. Sankey knows he's unlikely to gain the full support necessary to trigger a change. Commissioners from leagues like the Big12, Mountain West and ACC have little incentive to give up byes for conference champions.

● Big 12, ACC have little reason to rework College Football Playoff The first-round bye carries more value than bracket positioning. It also triggers additional financial compensation to the league represented in the quarterfinals.

Conference commissioners aren't in the business of turning down paydays.

“I do not have the appetite to give up any financial reward that comes with a bye,” Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark recently told Yahoo! Sports.

As ACC commissioner Jim Phillips told Yahoo! Sports, earmarking byes for conference champions is “not some exotic structure.”

Indeed, a professional league might call that common sense.

If at-large playoff qualifiers become eligible for byes, college football would become America’s only sport in which a team could finish fourth in its conference standings and earn a playoff bye.

The commissioners reportedly will meet in Dallas later this month to discuss the playoff’s future. If even one rival conference commissioner tells Sankey, “No thanks, bucko. We like the playoff as is,” the format will remain the same next season.

In other words, grab a straw, SEC. You too, Big Ten. Those “Super Two” conferences puffed up during realignment by weakening other conferences, but now it’s time to grab a straw and slurp what they crumbled – for one more year, anyway.

● SEC, Big Ten will get their way, but question is how soon?

Impeding the “Super Two” in their playoff revision would be a short-lived roadblock to the playoff becoming a de facto SEC-Big Ten Invitational. Starting with the 2026 season, unanimous commissioner approval no longer will be required to change the format. At that time, the SEC and Big Ten gain additional authority over the bracket. Hard to imagine that'll be good for the 'little guy' conferences.

So, changes very likely are coming, but why should rival commissioners capitalate to Sankey and Tony Petitti, Sankey's Big Ten cohort, any sooner than required?

If teams were seeded based off ranking this past season, Big Ten and SEC teams would have seized all the byes.

I don't fault the SEC for snapping up Texas and Oklahoma and triggering realignment, and Sankey's just doing his job by seeking an avenue to more byes for SEC teams. The SEC endured two consecutive seasons without advancing a team to the national championship game, so the conference could use a boost. But, the Big 12, ACC and others have no reason to fork it over.

Yormark and Phillips would be doing their jobs by telling Sankey to spend the next year slurping up the beautiful 12team playoff vision that he helped crumble into realignment soup
 
Giving a quota of playoff spots to a conference based on perceived value and strength before the competition begins would make college football unlike any other competitions I know in collegiate or professional sports. I agree with the Big 12 and ACC taking the rest of the football playing schools and doing their own thing with them to create a fair system of competition. I would be happy for Tech to be in that group. Letting the Big 10 and SEC throw their weight around without complaint in hopes that eventually we get asked to join their clique is a bad strategy.

The only way I would agree to a quota of bids would be to base the next year's bids on conference performance in the playoffs the year before. If SEC gets four bids and goes 1-4 and Memphis makes the title game and the ACC gets three bids and wins the title, going 5-2, then the next year ACC and AAC get more bids and the SEC less. Sankey would never agree to that. He is for monopoly power, unfair advantages, and perceived superiority to drive the future of college athletics, especially in football.
 
College football in its current form will die a slow death.

This is inevitable.

The SEC/B1G are not gonna want to share the money with the ACC/Big12.

They will cut them out eventually.

Maybe they will raid a few more teams but eventually D1 will be the 40 odd SEC/B1G teams.

So we’ve already reduced the number of colleges with significant interest in the top levels of college football from something like 70 during the Power 5 era to around 40. This will almost certainly hurt overall viewership going forward as students and alumni from those 30 odd teams are less interested in college football and move over to the much better managed and more exciting product provided by the pros.

But then when you have 40 teams, the Alabamas and the Ohio Stares will eventually tire of the Vanderbilts and Northwesterns getting “undeserved” money. So they will be the next to go.

The 40 teams will likely be whittled down to the top 25 or so teams.

Let’s say it’s 32 to match the pros.

And that’s what it will eventually boil down to. 32 college teams with a structure resembling the NFL.

This will be great if you’re a student, alumni or otherwise affiliated with those 32 teams. But if you’re not, the pros will be a much better option.

So overall viewership will reduce dramatically very soon.

I would hate for this to happen but I can’t see any incentives for this not to happen. I would love for people to tell me why I’m wrong.
 
College football in its current form will die a slow death.

This is inevitable.

The SEC/B1G are not gonna want to share the money with the ACC/Big12.

They will cut them out eventually.

Maybe they will raid a few more teams but eventually D1 will be the 40 odd SEC/B1G teams.

So we’ve already reduced the number of colleges with significant interest in the top levels of college football from something like 70 during the Power 5 era to around 40. This will almost certainly hurt overall viewership going forward as students and alumni from those 30 odd teams are less interested in college football and move over to the much better managed and more exciting product provided by the pros.

But then when you have 40 teams, the Alabamas and the Ohio Stares will eventually tire of the Vanderbilts and Northwesterns getting “undeserved” money. So they will be the next to go.

The 40 teams will likely be whittled down to the top 25 or so teams.

Let’s say it’s 32 to match the pros.

And that’s what it will eventually boil down to. 32 college teams with a structure resembling the NFL.

This will be great if you’re a student, alumni or otherwise affiliated with those 32 teams. But if you’re not, the pros will be a much better option.

So overall viewership will reduce dramatically very soon.

I would hate for this to happen but I can’t see any incentives for this not to happen. I would love for people to tell me why I’m wrong.
The only way I could tell you that you are wrong is that this is huge mess, there are many moving parts and competing interests and enough variables in play that any prediction as to what is specifically going to happen is almost certainly going to be wrong. But that's no slight whatsoever, this whole thing has become an abomination and once the explosion happens it's very difficult to predict the path and interactions of each fragment.

The only thing I would add to what you have outlined above is that I don't think there will be a 1:1 transference of fans to the pros, there will be some that simply lose interest and find other things to do, and many that have and will never have an desire to watch the NFL. Overall, will the number of fans grow? Who knows, I guess it depends on the path today's younger folks walk, because the ones who loved the traditional aspect of college football will mostly be driven away. I'm already as un-interested as I have ever been (formerly rabid fan). Basically I care about GT gameday and that's it. Don't get me wrong, I want us to win titles etc... and would certainly enjoy every moment of that, but I don't care at all about any other team, any other conference, who makes the playoffs etc... I'm pretty sure that if it wasn't for Tech I would pay very little attention to football at all.
 
So what you guys are saying, is that Mama was right!
1000019476.jpg
 
The only way I could tell you that you are wrong is that this is huge mess, there are many moving parts and competing interests and enough variables in play that any prediction as to what is specifically going to happen is almost certainly going to be wrong. But that's no slight whatsoever, this whole thing has become an abomination and once the explosion happens it's very difficult to predict the path and interactions of each fragment.

The only thing I would add to what you have outlined above is that I don't think there will be a 1:1 transference of fans to the pros, there will be some that simply lose interest and find other things to do, and many that have and will never have an desire to watch the NFL. Overall, will the number of fans grow? Who knows, I guess it depends on the path today's younger folks walk, because the ones who loved the traditional aspect of college football will mostly be driven away. I'm already as un-interested as I have ever been (formerly rabid fan). Basically I care about GT gameday and that's it. Don't get me wrong, I want us to win titles etc... and would certainly enjoy every moment of that, but I don't care at all about any other team, any other conference, who makes the playoffs etc... I'm pretty sure that if it wasn't for Tech I would pay very little attention to football at all.
I don't give a damn about the NFL. I never watch their games, and I have no intention of ever watching any of them....both football, basketball, and baseball.
 
Back
Top