Hey wannabe lawbee, your "legal analysis" of the Scranton situation as being "very serious" is a joke. The case will either get dismissed or at worst he'll get first offender probation in which event the conviction will be removed from his record once the probation is over with, but he's not going to spend any time in jail over this.
The fact that the judge gave him a personal recognizance bond shows how not serious this charge is. Your comparison of this to rape charges is further proof of your out of touch analysis.
My question to you is: are you a true lawbee (GT grad with a law degree), or are you just a season ticket holder with a JD? My guess is the latter b/c all the GT grads I knew in law school were sharp as tacs. I'll bet you went to Ga. Southern and John Marshall law. Please don't tell me you went to UGA law b/c if you did you're just reaffirming the false notion of weak academics at UGA to which so many on this board seem to subscribe.
Also, nice dodge on the question about Scranton's eligibility. If you don't know the answer, just fess up to it. Just b/c you have a JD doesn't mean you're up to date on the finer points of NCAA eligibility regulations. It's okay to admit your ignorance rather than trying to maintain the farce that you know everything.
