M
Mr. Truth
Guest
but, as long as we run the Option (and assuming that we don't throw the ball more than 15 times a game) our QB whoever he is will NEVER achieve 1st team All-ACC.
Even if Tech is 12-0 and the Option QB runs for over a 1,000 yards and leads a ground assault for over 4,000 yards for the year with zero turnovers.
That is because (as recent history proves) the best QB(s) are the ones with the best pure passing numbers.
Take this year - I am not going to argue that Nesbitt should be the 1st team all-ACC QB. He has been injured (missed some games); he has turned it over a few times and hasn't exactly excelled at passing (although his "QB rating" is quite good due to his avg. yard per attempt) but there is a .00001% chance he will finish ahead of Russell Wilson of NC State (who is quite good - but is the QB for a losing team).
All I am saying is that - it shouldn't be a "one in a million" that Nesbitt gets more votes than Wilson, but the brain-dead voters will only look at the passing stats because that is how it is "has been". Stupid F***ers!
Even if Tech is 12-0 and the Option QB runs for over a 1,000 yards and leads a ground assault for over 4,000 yards for the year with zero turnovers.
That is because (as recent history proves) the best QB(s) are the ones with the best pure passing numbers.
Take this year - I am not going to argue that Nesbitt should be the 1st team all-ACC QB. He has been injured (missed some games); he has turned it over a few times and hasn't exactly excelled at passing (although his "QB rating" is quite good due to his avg. yard per attempt) but there is a .00001% chance he will finish ahead of Russell Wilson of NC State (who is quite good - but is the QB for a losing team).
All I am saying is that - it shouldn't be a "one in a million" that Nesbitt gets more votes than Wilson, but the brain-dead voters will only look at the passing stats because that is how it is "has been". Stupid F***ers!