law_bee
Dodd-Like
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Messages
- 6,399
I will say this is the only name thrown around that would make any sense.
1. arguably he know the academics b/c of his mill acadamy experience
2. did a solid job at GSU (where I got my undergrad)
3. probably would take the job
Negatives
1. "goofy" offense (like Wake) and I am not sure it can be successful in the ACC
2. ready for BIG TIME?
If CG is going to be "runoff" this is probably a realistic replacement. I don't know if he can do as good or better than CG but I suppose it is possible.
1. arguably he know the academics b/c of his mill acadamy experience
2. did a solid job at GSU (where I got my undergrad)
3. probably would take the job
Negatives
1. "goofy" offense (like Wake) and I am not sure it can be successful in the ACC
2. ready for BIG TIME?
If CG is going to be "runoff" this is probably a realistic replacement. I don't know if he can do as good or better than CG but I suppose it is possible.