Re: Stick..
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I honestly don't see it changing much, and any change would likely be for the better as people wouldn't be getting as liquored up as possible before kickoff. As such, I am neutral on the issue and really couldn't care less either way. The jerks are going to be jerks regardless of if they have a beer in hand or not, they just use that as an excuse for acting like a jackass.
That said, do we really need another overpriced concession?
[/ QUOTE ]
RP, I agree that if a person is a jerk they are going to be a jerk. However we can't ignore that people DO become less inhibited, or at least most do, when they have some alcohol in them and that many times their personality becomes enhanced and so they act even worse than they normally would. And to be fair if you are a really cool person then sometimes alcohol enhances that part of your personality too so it isn't all bad.
I also agree with your comment that many use alcohol as an excuse for their behavior! Excellent observation!!!
I don't understand, though, how any change would likely be for the better. I disagree mildly with this statement but am open to your thoughts and would like to ask for a little more information on why you think that. I'm not saying, by the way, that any change would automatically be for the worse. I'm leaning towards change being somewhat minimal either way.
Like you I'm somewhat neutral on this issue (which is of course why I'm so open to hearing other people's thoughts
).
[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly because they're have beer and with the cost they've likely be sobering up faster than they're getting more sloshed from the flasked Old Crow (I kid, I hope our fans at least have Jack/Beam) they're sucking down now. And if you're visibly overly intoxicated the vendors will hopefully have enough sense to cut you off.
