Poll Tenuta or Muschamp

Tenuta or Muschamp

  • Tenuta

    Votes: 22 31.4%
  • Muschamp

    Votes: 48 68.6%

  • Total voters
    70
not sure what the point in this poll is now, unless you know something that we dont :)
 
We may already have a HC. If not we do not even know if Tenuta is being considered. Published reports from several outlets have stated WM has been dropped from the list if in fact he ever was really on it.
 
not sure what the point in this poll is now, unless you know something that we dont :)

the point of the poll is this.

certain somebodies forced PJ down rads throat. If PJ decides no on tech, we will hire JT.

So, we get JT. The question is, if we had just accepted WM from the beginning would that have been a better option than JT?

see here is the point the donors, in the infinite brilliance, probably didn't realized just b/c you force someone down rads throat; it doesn't mean that someone wants to be here. They effectively rejected every other candidate for reasons beyond me, and now PJ may say no.

call it rumor, I don't care. I know enough to know what is going on.

a small sample of this boards votes, will show to me, that some think JT or WM was better from the get go; and show that if WM is better; then this whole circus only crippled GT in the long run; as we lost a candidate many support and was our AD #1 choice.
 

ok, vote for the guy you would want between the two.

hatcher isn't part of this anymore. Nor is WM....its JT or PJ. But, I just want to see what people would think between the could have with WM vs a high likely JT. Thats all.
 
ok, vote for the guy you would want between the two.

hatcher isn't part of this anymore. Nor is WM....its JT or PJ. But, I just want to see what people would think between the could have with WM vs a high likely JT. Thats all.

Then I would take JT
 
Poll:

Georgia Tech Fans should make sure that whatever happens with our coaching hire, we have an excuse to complain about what could have been, and have a nice ripe scapegoat to rake through the mud in our misery.

Yes? No?
 
Poll:

Georgia Tech Fans should make sure that whatever happens with our coaching hire, we have an excuse to complain about what could have been, and have a nice ripe scapegoat to rake through the mud in our misery.

Yes? No?

yes if its true the way i was told RE: clough and donors

no if Rad was given the freedom to do what he wanted from the get go.
 
If WM is such a good choice :bowdown:, then who else is looking to hire him?

I guess I could say the same about ....PJ - Duke/smu (there's validation)
or RN - none
or Hatcher - none
or Edsall - lets see none
JT - none

how about all the people that were knocking down Tressels door...none
or the huge line for Richt....none
or wait...yes....the massive line for Pete Carrol

who is or isn't looking at a coaching option isn't validation at all. Charlie strong has been looked at by every big school on the east coast...he must be good right?

The point is finding who is a good fit, and what is desirable by your AD making the call. We may or may not find the first part; the second part was shot in the butt.
 
ok, vote for the guy you would want between the two.

hatcher isn't part of this anymore. Nor is WM....its JT or PJ. But, I just want to see what people would think between the could have with WM vs a high likely JT. Thats all.
We are not doing the hiring, so the poll is worthless
 
Do we HAVE to hire a head coach?

Nowhere in the rules does it state this as necessary.

We should hire Tenuta but name him something like SUPREME COMMANDER OF GT FOOTBALL.
 
Back
Top