Randy Edsall-square peg for a square hole..

chazgoat

Varsity Lurker
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
112
That's an exciting thread title for a super exciting FB program huh? What I mean by it is I simply think that he is a good fit and will be a better choice than alot of people give him credit for. No, his style is not in your face, no it doesn't make you want to run through a brick wall, it wins FB games!! I'll give the obligatory "I'm gonna obviously support WHOEVER we hire", because I will, plain and simple. I think many on here have given great thoughts on all the candidates that have good things surrounding each one of them. I trust DRAD is and will continue doing great things for GT as he makes the best choice for us.
Concerning RE, gotta say that first of all, I'm very biased so keep that in mind. However, I think many are selling Edsall short here, way short. Comments like, "he's in a weak conference", "he has a losing record", "he is not exciting", etc, etc. I don't think people are realizing what he's done at Yukon is simply amazing. Think of it like taking a 1-AA Duke, going D-1 and then COMPETING at a high level. All the while getting academics done and a +20,000 attendance differential since his arrival. He is a gem that SOMEONE will mine if we don't.
I encourage EVERYONE to read this bio about RANDY.

Only five times has a team ascended from Division I-AA to Division I-A and produced a .500 or better season in each of its first three years at the highest level of collegiate football and UConn is one of those programs.

UConn joined the BIG EAST Conference in 2004, finishing just one win shy of tying for the conference championship. The Huskies have led the conference in total defense both of their years in the league, and, during their debut season in 2004, led the BIG EAST in both total offense and total defense. The Huskies stand poised to continue their climb in the BCS Conference and much of the credit for this remarkable ascension is due to head coach Randy Edsall, who has compiled a 32-27 mark in the Huskies' first five Division I-A campaigns.

In the past five seasons, UConn has finished in the national top 20 for total offense (2003, 2004) and total defense (2002, 2005). Under Edsall's guidance, the Huskies have defeated members of the Atlantic Coast Conference, BIG EAST, Big Ten, Big 12 and Conference USA during their brief Division I-A tenure.

In addition to the great success on the field, UConn has performed admirably in the classroom under Edsall. In three of the past five years, including 2007, UConn was recognized by the American Football Coaches Assocation for its high graduation rate. In 2003, UConn was the only public I-A school to graduate at least 90 percent of its football players and in 2005, UConn was one of only eight schools to both graduate 70 percent and win a bowl game.

Edsall2Web07.jpg
In 2007, the NCAA’s Academic Progress Rate (APR) for the UConn football team was an impressive 963, which placed it higher than the national Bowl Subdivision average of 934 and among the top 20 percent of all football programs in the country.

Edsall guided that team to a 6-6 record in its first year with a full Division I-A compliment of 85 scholarships. UConn ended the 2002 season impressively with four-straight wins to reach the .500 mark, including season-ending road wins at Navy and at bowl-bound Iowa State of the Big 12 Conference.

"This was the day that the man on the street connected with UConn football," proclaimed a Connecticut sportswriter after the win. "It's his team, and by gawd, he's going to cheer for it."

UConn's .500 season was its best record since the squad won 10 games in 1998. The Huskies' six wins were more than the Huskies posted in 2000 (three) and 2001 (two) combined. The Huskies were the most improved Division I-A team in the country in 2002, according to preseason and postseason ratings by College Football News.

The excitement for Edsall and his team continued to swell in 2003 as the Huskies moved into their new home, Rentschler Field, and enjoyed the nation's largest attendance increase with a gain of 21,252 fans per game.

Finishing with a 9-3 record, many national media outlets, including Bristol-based ESPN, proclaimed that UConn should have received a bowl berth, a feat highly-uncommon for an independent team other than Notre Dame.

With their membership in the BIG EAST for the 2004 season, another strong campaign by the Huskies resulted in a bowl berth. UConn went 8-4 against a challenging slate that fall as the program gained its highest ever level of exposure with four nationally televised games on the ESPN family of networks, three of them in prime time. UConn used one of those opportunities to defeat eventual BCS participant Pittsburgh, 29-17, before a rowdy sell out crowd at Rentschler Field. The Huskies capped their historic season with a resounding 39-10 win over Mid-American Champion Toledo in the Motor City Bowl.
 
Great. We have a common opponent in WVU. How has the defensive genius done against them? Should I tell you or do you want to look it up?
 
Great. We have a common opponent in WVU. How has the defensive genius done against them? Should I tell you or do you want to look it up?

which genius? please tell me...I don't care enough to look it up. IMO, a 1 game performance against a common opponent(which happens to be the top of the BEC) doesn't mean anything.
 
Talk about eat up on LOTR!

Call your mom, try and calm down. Have some breakfast. It's gonna bee OK.

Good grief my hair's falling out. You guys are nuts!!
 
Temporary thread-jack:

Rodriguez doesn't seem to have a problem recruiting players to run his funky ground offense, and beat a few good teams along the way.
If we could do the same here, I wouldn't mind one bit. (Paul Johnson, not that I endorse him as favorite)

Back to your thread now. Sorry.
 
Great. We have a common opponent in WVU. How has the defensive genius done against them? Should I tell you or do you want to look it up?
i think we have a little more talent, speed, and size to match up with WVU and guess what they still scored a boat load on us!
 
edsall is not the right choice. he reminds me all too much of gailey. he maybe a hard worker, but he's not energetic, and he doesn't put butts in the seats. and what this program needs right now is more energy and more butts in the seats. don't forget he has a 50-54 record at uconn. thats like .450. yea, sure sounds impressive to me.
 
edsall is not the right choice. he reminds me all too much of gailey. he maybe a hard worker, but he's not energetic, and he doesn't put butts in the seats. and what this program needs right now is more energy and more butts in the seats. don't forget he has a 50-54 record at uconn. thats like .450. yea, sure sounds impressive to me.
Winning puts butts in the seats, IMO - personality just helps with the lean times. It sounds like they're selling all of their season tickets under him (I forget where I read that). And I can't hold that record against him with their football recently moving up to Div 1-A and getting out from under the shadow of UConn roundball. He's done a great job there.

I'd be fine with any one of a number of guys, including our current HC/DC. Anyone is a gamble at this point for different reasons.
 
UConn people back RE but they don't consider him exciting in the least. If we hire him, I'll be behind him, but I really don't get excited about that hire at all. I'm sure he's a good man, good football mind, etc., but if we're looking for something to make fans and recruits sit up and say "wow" I don't think it's him.
 
Bobby Ross wasn't exciting. He had the reptutation of being the first guy at GTAA in the morning and the last guy out at night.

The AJC article about Edsall immediately reminded me of Ross.
 
Great. We have a common opponent in WVU. How has the defensive genius done against them? Should I tell you or do you want to look it up?

Not sure what you're getting at here. Last year, the same year we played them, UConn gave up 37 points and we gave up 38 points. Although UConn didn't put up the offensive numbers we did, they also didn't have the overall number 2 draft pick on their team, or the number of future NFL draft picks we had on defense.

There are also plenty of good football head coaches out there who are not exciting. Jim Tressel, Mack Brown, Frank Beamer and even Urban Meyer aren't exactly exciting. Fans don't come to a game to see the coach's press conference; they come to see the product on the field.

I'm leaning towards Edsall and Hatcher myself, although I'm still worried about Hatcher's lack of experience.
 
Back
Top