Recruit'n

romegajacket said:
Evidently those folks over there at Rivals don't have a lot of confidence in how our verbals are listed by stars.

As of their last update, 11/2/06, we had only 6 four star verbals.

Must be something here that I'm not understanding.

http://rivals100.rivals.com/teamrank.asp

romegajacket...you probably have not seen my posts...but you cannot compare the Rivals and Scout star ranking....just as you cannot with any service.

Rivals gives out less 4 and 5 stars than Scout...it is all a ranking system.

Just like some services have 10 star systems...that one is just more obviously different.

In many cases a 3 star on Rivals is a 4-star on Scout.

The national writers on both Rivals and Scout have been raving about the GT class.

...of course Philip Wheeler and KMike were 2 stars!!
 
I noticed UGA is doing a hell of a job out of state, 3 recruits just from Chatham Virginia:...
 
hiveredtech said:
romegajacket...you probably have not seen my posts...but you cannot compare the Rivals and Scout star ranking....just as you cannot with any service.

Rivals gives out less 4 and 5 stars than Scout...it is all a ranking system.

Just like some services have 10 star systems...that one is just more obviously different.

In many cases a 3 star on Rivals is a 4-star on Scout.

The national writers on both Rivals and Scout have been raving about the GT class.

...of course Philip Wheeler and KMike were 2 stars!!

Hivered,
Normally I make sure to read your posts but somehow that got by me.

Thanks for the info. BOR has stated time and again that stars don't mean much and after what you just stated, I can see why.

Thanks again
 
If stars meant a whole lot, there's no way we'd beat Miami **

Nfm
 
goldmember said:
I noticed UGA is doing a hell of a job out of state, 3 recruits just from Chatham Virginia:...
Just on the off chance that you're not being facetious - the Chatham, VA recruits are Hargrave Military Academy students, aka non-qualifiers. They're not necessarily from Virginia.
 
romegajacket said:
Hivered,
Normally I make sure to read your posts but somehow that got by me.

Thanks for the info. BOR has stated time and again that stars don't mean much and after what you just stated, I can see why.

Thanks again

I just realized my post was worded poorly...I was doing two things at once.

What I should have said is I wondered the same thing, inquired to Rivals, then posted their response twice over here. That is when they explained that a 3-star often is the same overall player ranking as a 4-star on another site because they give out less 4 and 5 stars.

Sorry for the somewhat snotty sounding post.
 
Back
Top