The front page article in today's issue of the Technique is a pretty well-written article on the Reck's current search for a new garage. In case you didn't know, the Reck is currently housed in a garage provided by the Administration but due to renovation plans it will have to move in the next year and a half.
Here's the article -
http://nique.net/news/100204
This happens every five years. The AA tries it whenever they think the last students who stopped it or solved the problem are gone, and I'm sure they are eager to try it with a new administration.
If the various student groups don't work together, I'm sure the AA will succeed.
The Ramblin' Wreck is student owned, student maintained, and a member of the student body. This ticks a lot of people off. The list starts with the Alumni Association, which once tried to take control of the wreck. They now have an imitation wreck.
These are the main factors at play here:
1) Funding for the ramblin wreck traditionally came from several sources, including the AA (this includes funding in kind, like free rent). Right now, budgets are tight and managers must do more with less. And it is hard to do much when you cannnot call for a command appearance.
2) The Wreck is a well-known symbol of the Institute. When something happens to that symbol, such as an actual wreck, people take note. They ask questions. When the wreck was nearly destroyed, a lot of people wondered why the AA or the Institute did not pay for insurance. Ringing phones and heated emails don't make any manager happy.
3) The AA is resistant to student control. The new administration also has its own views, which the interested can learn about from seeing how it dealt with students at UC-Boulder. Their relationship with the Greek system there is highly instructive. Students rarely know how to kick the administration in the balls and get their way. This is probably a test case in many ways. Either students have to pay for everything themselves--no free rent--or turn over some control to the AA. If students have good leaders, they'll brow beat the administration into backing down.
------------------
If the major student players (Reck Club, SGA, Greeks, band, minority groups, and student publications) call the administration's hand openly and frequently, they'll win. This EXACT same thing has happened AT LEAST twice before.
If they try to work things out quietly, they'll lose and they will lose badly. Of course, they'll pat themselves on the back and enjoy being administration lap dogs. This Technique article is a good first step.
The administration should be happy if students push back on issues like this. Those responses will prevent the new admin from doing anything that truly alienates alumni and hurts donations.
In short, the administration will never allow the Reck to have a showcase on campus and a nice garage unless they can control the Reck. And anyone who thinks the reck should not be controlled by the students is worse than a U[sic]GA fan in my mind.
The best situation is for an alumnus (or alumna) with a long record of giving to step up and rectify the situation. Otherwise, this story will keep repeating itself until the admin gets lucky and finds student leaders without brains and spines.