toe meets leather
Flats Noob
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2001
- Messages
- 901
chan is reminding me of george and dan. he may think there is no since of urgency ,that gt is just a academic institution and football is a sideline. WRONG.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">No offense, but I doubt that the coaching staff puts in the hours that they do to come in and "just have fun." Further, rest assured that Gailey also has a clear understanding that he is not being paid close to $1 million per year to come in and win 5 or 6 games a year. Whether or not the coaching staff does well w/gameday coaching, development, recruiting, etc. will bear it self out for better or worse over the next couple of years and Gailey will be judged accordingly.Originally posted by toe meets leather:
chan is reminding me of george and dan. he may think there is no since of urgency ,that gt is just a academic institution and football is a sideline. WRONG.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Lets start blaming the STUDENT ATHLETES.Originally posted by GT98:
The reality is that the QB is currently not able to do this.
.[/QB]
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Lets start blaming the STUDENT ATHLETES.Originally posted by law_bee:
.[/QB]
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">LOL, I feel the same way. I have been cheering for GT too long to quit, regardless of the win/loss record. I do have high expectations regarding our program and I also share the recruiting concern. Regardless of whether one liked or did NOT like O'leary (I liked him!), he and his staff did very, very well recruiting and bringing in young men w/good character that by and large have represented the Institute and themselves very well.Originally posted by Big Buck:
I couldn't stop supporting Tech if I wanted as I have been a Tech man for 56 years and my youngest son is a Tech man
CHEM.E. in the early 70's.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Axe,Originally posted by Axe:
Beeware,
Offensive line play has been solid.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">I agree totally. Without Hollings, it'll be a little tougher to establish that running game. But as long as there are holes being opened, we can do it.Originally posted by Gold Rush:
It really seems to me that Suggs performs much better (as does the OL) when we establish the run first and then go to play-action passing...That seems to be the personality of this team for some reason...The OL also looks better run blocking IMO.