<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">You are right, but after thinking a little more about our defense, these are the best senior linebackers as a whole we have had and they have seen this offense 3 years soon to be 4. I also think that helps Henderson out, who was pretty much shut down on Sat. It will be a little more open for him to use his strengths in the passing game. Landry has been the biggest surprise for me. The guy I would pick on until he proves otherwise is still Cox at 5' 10". I do feel we need to rotate an LB or lineman in a little more and we will be ok. But I think the no-huddle is a good obstacle for us to overcome because if we want to turn the corner so to speak, and our offense picks it up a notch, then our defense and Tenuta can make the adjustments correctly.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Gnome, I can't help but think all of your posts are somehow going to be an underhanded shot at Gailey and the coaches. But, if someone else had posted this, I would say you're probably right, but I really hope we don't let down after the last 2 weeks. What does your name mean anyway?
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Gnome, I can't help but think all of your posts are somehow going to be an underhanded shot at Gailey and the coaches. But, if someone else had posted this, I would say you're probably right, but I really hope we don't let down after the last 2 weeks. What does your name mean anyway?</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">My feelings about the AA havent changed one bit. Look at my posts. I have never thought that Gailey could get the job done, although have said many of times I hope he proves me wrong. I want to be as surprised as I was in 2000. I feel the AD has let Gailey down and that we needed a new one to bring organization to the AA. As I have said, everyone who has questioned what is going on at the Flats and Gailey in particular, including myself, would be less inclined to "question his moves" if there was more faith in the AD, who is Gailey's boss and ultimately makes the decisions for our program. Gailey has been out on an island because of the AD. I still am not sold on his philosophy but will be the first to admit his worked when the time comes.
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Gnome, I can't help but think all of your posts are somehow going to be an underhanded shot at Gailey and the coaches. But, if someone else had posted this, I would say you're probably right, but I really hope we don't let down after the last 2 weeks. What does your name mean anyway?</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">My feelings about the AA havent changed one bit. Look at my posts. I have never thought that Gailey could get the job done, although have said many of times I hope he proves me wrong. I want to be as surprised as I was in 2000. I feel the AD has let Gailey down and that we needed a new one to bring organization to the AA. As I have said, everyone who has questioned what is going on at the Flats and Gailey in particular, including myself, would be less inclined to "question his moves" if there was more faith in the AD, who is Gailey's boss and ultimately makes the decisions for our program. Gailey has been out on an island because of the AD. I still am not sold on his philosophy but will be the first to admit his worked when/if the time comes.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">
<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">My sentiments exactly, Nutts, and I don't think we will let down.