Well, thank you Jon Beason...

GT65_UGA89 said:
...for the bulletin board material.

'Canes still miffed over '05 loss
Miami LB calls Jackets upset a fluke

Here's the ajc link: http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports/gatech/stories/2006/10/24/1025techfoot.html
Click to expand...

Typical AJC article as well as how much it brings the "loser" out in the player making the comments.

His game w/GT and w/FSU was 60 minutes long each.

If they wanted to prove their superiority over GT or FSU, they had the chance to do it...they failed.

I hate to see any losing party refer to the other team's win as a "fluke."

Could be they had a better team than us, if so, they should have proved it.

They didn't, they lost, no fluk'n.
 
Re: Final game stats: GT vs UM (11/19/2005)

GT65_UGA89 said:
GT vs UM (11/19/2005)
http://ramblinwreck.cstv.com/sports/m-footbl/stats/2005-2006/game10.html

Some key stats:
First Downs- GT 20 UM 11
Rushes-Yards- GT 44-120 UM 30-30
Third-Down Conversions- GT 5 of 17 UM 1 of 14
Fourth-Down Conversions- GT 0 of 0 UM 0 of 2
Sacks By: Number-Yards- GT 7-48 UM 1-12

...and finally: GT 14 UM 10
Click to expand...
Really seems like a fluke doesn't it? Typical anti-GT crap from the Atlanta Urinal Constapation.
 
Re: Final game stats: GT vs UM (11/19/2005)

TechGator1066 said:
Really seems like a fluke doesn't it? Typical anti-GT crap from the Atlanta Urinal Constapation.
Click to expand...

Poor perspective IMO. They just tricked a UM player into giving us mounds and mounds of bulletin board material.
 
I say we prove him wrong by beating the ever-living crap out of that entire team on Saturday.

Any disagreements?
 
GTROY said:
I say we prove him wrong by beating the ever-living crap out of that entire team on Saturday.

Any disagreements?
Click to expand...
:greenclap: :greenclap:
None from me! Pulvarize scUM!!!!!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top