Who (or will there be) a speaker at

I think the people who need to show cojones are the ones (semi-)anonymously bashing bashing CG on these bulletin board websites. I've never heard any of these negative concerns expressed in person at lunch with Chan (or George, of course GOL would have kicked your butt). See ya'll there -- I usually sit in the back-right seats.

Of course, I don't think CG would respond to, "Why don't you run yourself out of town, and tell DB to hire the Seattle Bowl staff".
 
None of the Seattle Bowl staff will come close to getting a head coaching position in the near future, unless it is at a division 1AA school.

drinking.gif
 
Originally posted by ahsoisee:
None of the Seattle Bowl staff will come close to getting a head coaching position in the near future, unless it is at a division 1AA school.

<font size="2" face="Arial, Verdana, Sans-Serif">Yeah, The seattle bowl staff got lucky. If they were here, the program would be in much worse shape than it is now. That staff was nationally known as poor recruiters. And it was a Braine-dead decision to let them at the helm for even only one game. Fortunately they didn't run the program into the ground.
 
Calderman, the absolute truth to the matter is the fact you do not know if Tech would be better, the same, or worse if we had kept the old staff.

You can only guess and speculate. Anything beyond that is a figment of your imagination and does not represent facts.

wink.gif
 
Well you've convinced me! I'll never again state my opinions as fact, and once I've stated those opinions I won't repeat them multiple times per day for months on end.
 
Gailey should be there. He could stop alot of this negativism (is that a word?) by showing some cojones and answering some questions.
 
Back
Top