WSJ: Announced vs Actual Attendance

18in32

Petard Hoister
Joined
May 23, 2010
Messages
27,889
As everyone knows, students and other fans are less interested in CFB than they used to be. The problem is worse than generally reported, though, because of the open secret that attendance numbers bear little relationship to actual attendance.

The WSJ did an open-records investigation, seeking out 'scanned ticket' info from schools, and comparing it to announced attendance. The results are shocking, as even at the big schools numbers are routinely inflated. On average, scanned attendance was 71% of announced attendance. (At Tech it was 72.3%. FSU was 57%! UGA didn't provide numbers.) Anyhow, here's the story for you non-80k-ers...

PS. Only one school in the country uses scanned attendance as their announced attendance: Navy.

WSJ:

When Minnesota hosted Nebraska at TCF Bank Stadium last year, the game featured charismatic new Golden Gophers coach P.J. Fleck, a home team fighting for a bowl berth and a big-name opponent. The announced attendance was 39,933—an OK crowd for a crisp November day in Minneapolis—but it didn’t tell the whole story.

Only 25,493 ticketed fans were counted at the gates, 36% lower than the announced attendance and about half of the stadium’s capacity. More than 14,000 people who bought tickets or got them free didn’t show up.

College football has an attendance problem. Average announced attendance in football’s top division dropped for the fourth consecutive year last year, declining 7.6% in four years. But schools’ internal records show that the sport’s attendance woes go far beyond that.

The average count of tickets scanned at home games—the number of fans who actually show up—is about 71% of the attendance you see in a box score, according to data from the 2017 season collected by The Wall Street Journal. In the Mid-American Conference, with less-prominent programs like Central Michigan and Toledo, teams’ scanned attendance numbers were 45% of announced attendance.

Even teams in the nation’s five richest conferences routinely record thousands fewer people passing through stadium gates than they report publicly. The no-shows reflect the challenge of filling large venues when nearly every game is on TV, and they threaten a key revenue source for college athletic departments.

“Attendance drives recruiting, attendance drives donations, merchandise sales,” said Rob Sine, who until earlier this year was president of IMG Learfield Ticket Solutions, which works with dozens of colleges. If fans don’t use their tickets, he added, “they’re more likely to not come back.”

Most schools scan and keep count of tickets used at football games. The Journal requested access to those counts under public-records law, and most public schools supplied them. Private schools aren’t subject to public-records law.

Minnesota’s gap between scanned and announced attendance could have been worse—its announced attendance doesn’t include stadium staff, marching bands or media, as many other schools do. A Minnesota spokesman said officials were unavailable to comment.

When Minnesota hosted Nebraska at TCF Bank Stadium last year, only 25,493 ticketed fans were counted at the gates, 36% lower than the announced attendance.

When Arkansas hosted No. 21 Auburn, scanned attendance was more than 25,000 lower than announced attendance. Overall last season, Arkansas’s scanned home attendance was 58% of its announced attendance as the Razorbacks went 4-8. Nonetheless, Reynolds Razorback Stadium is reopening Saturday after a $160 million renovation that increased capacity by about 4,000. An Arkansas spokesman declined to comment.

Florida State, which won the 2013 national title, last season had a scanned attendance that was 57% of its announced attendance. FSU spokesman Rob Wilson blamed personnel and technical issues in scanning tickets and said, “We do not believe the difference is as large as the data appears to show.”

Sine, the ticketing expert who’s now chief revenue officer at ticketing company AXS, said technology has improved to the point that scanning errors generally have a minor effect on ticket counts.

Attendance is more than a vanity issue. The NCAA requires schools to maintain a 15,000 “actual or paid” home attendance on a rolling two-year average to stay in football’s top division.

Many schools take a generous approach in compiling announced attendance, by including ushers, security guards and even the guy at the concession stand who sells you a Coke. That partly explains how Purdue’s announced attendance last season spiked 13,433 per game—the largest jump in college football. (Purdue didn’t report how many tickets it actually scanned last year, citing what a spokesman called “outdated equipment, connectivity problems and user error.”)

The NCAA accepts the announced attendance numbers schools submit “at face value,” NCAA spokesman Christopher Radford said.

Despite the rising value of TV-rights contracts, football ticket sales and donations often make up more than half of athletic-department revenues. College sports officials say many factors are incenting fans to stay home including: affordable big-screen TVs; the availability of more games on TV; ever-changing kickoff times that make it difficult to plan ahead; games that span more than four hours; traffic; and rising ticket prices.


Sagging student attendance remains a problem, even at perennial power Alabama. As part of a recently announced renovation of Bryant-Denny Stadium, the school plans to add a student terrace to create “a more interactive and social environment,” athletic director Greg Byrne said.

The renovations also will add more club and lounge areas and slightly reduce the stadium’s 101,821 capacity, part of a trend of downsizing college football stadiums.

Crowds at South Carolina have ebbed in recent years and scanned attendance made up 78% of the Gamecocks’ announced attendance last season. South Carolina held a one-day sale for the season opener against Coastal Carolina: $18.01 per ticket in honor of the school’s founding year. It sold 3,100 of those.

“If you’re in the upper deck and buying a ticket for 45 bucks, and the choice is, I can sit on my couch and have a really good view, you might do that,” said Lance Grantham, associate athletic director for ticketing and customer relations. “The [TV] product is just outrageously good.”

Public attendance numbers are part of some schools’ identity. Michigan Stadium, the “Big House,” whose 107,601 capacity is the nation’s largest, still claims a streak of 100,000-plus attendance games dating back to 1975, even though two games last year showed fewer than 80,000 scanned tickets.

A Michigan spokesman said surges of fans at gates just before kickoff sometimes prompt workers to tear tickets rather than scanning them. Michigan counts the media, stadium workers and marching bands in its announced attendance.

Nebraska boasts a sellout streak that dates to the 1962 season. But during last year’s 4-8 record, there was an average gap of more than 18,000 per game between scanned and announced attendance—mostly no-shows, a spokesman said.

Free tickets often are counted among attendance figures even if they’re never used. California, on the hook to repay the cost of a $321 million renovation for Memorial Stadiumunveiled in 2012, gave away 57,108 tickets last season. That’s nearly an entire free game at the 62,467-seat stadium. About 35% of the free tickets were used, school officials say.

“Our sales and marketing team continues to look for more creative and unique ways to bring fans to Memorial Stadium,” said Joe Mulford, senior associate athletic director and chief revenue officer.

Not every school pumps up its attendance figures. Of the nearly 100 football programs that gave data to the Journal, just one used a turnstile count for its announced attendance: Navy.

Said athletic director Chet Gladchuk: “It is just the way we do business.”
 
I'm surprised ours was as high as 72%. I'm guessing that varies wildly from game to game -- < 50% for cupcakes and > 80% for decent games.
 
I know it sounds bad, but we should reduce the capacity, and provide actual individual seats in all sections except for visitors (move them to the upper north) and keep benches for the student sections. Add a clubhouse/cushioned seating on the home side. Add beer/wine gardens to the exterior of the stadium. Remove walls or barriers that create pinch points. Make the corridors like a mueseum/hall of fame showcase area like Suntrust. The goal should be to make Bobby Dodd the Cadillac of college football stadiums. I don’t give a crap about 100,000 attendance numbers. I’ve sat in the AD’s box and it’s embarrassingly shitty. My wife is a uga alum, so we’ve been to several of their games in the boxes, and they are exceptional with outdoor seating included with the box. Mercedes Benz has these small four person booths at the top of the 100 sections with servers and minifridges. You’re in the open, with the fans, but have a nice roomy, personal space, too. I loved those seats. More than any luxury box I’ve been in. I got to sit in them at the first Falcons game in MB because they had screwed up our season tickets (double booked our seats with someone else). I guess you could attach a bunch of led lights everywhere, because everyone seems to rave about that at MB. Maybe introduce some technology based entertainment with apps and WiFi. Set up big screens in the tailgating areas with college game day or other football games on if it’s a 3:30 or later game.
 
The primary thing I would change at Grant Field is the amount of space on the bleachers. Not enough hip room, not enough knee room. I guess people really are bigger than they were 100 years ago. Or maybe I just need to lose weight.
 
Wow, I knew attendance was down everywhere but just seeing some of those figures is stunning.
 
I know it sounds bad, but we should reduce the capacity, and provide actual individual seats in all sections except for visitors (move them to the upper north) and keep benches for the student sections. Add a clubhouse/cushioned seating on the home side. Add beer/wine gardens to the exterior of the stadium. Remove walls or barriers that create pinch points. Make the corridors like a mueseum/hall of fame showcase area like Suntrust. The goal should be to make Bobby Dodd the Cadillac of college football stadiums. I don’t give a crap about 100,000 attendance numbers. I’ve sat in the AD’s box and it’s embarrassingly ööööty. My wife is a uga alum, so we’ve been to several of their games in the boxes, and they are exceptional with outdoor seating included with the box. Mercedes Benz has these small four person booths at the top of the 100 sections with servers and minifridges. You’re in the open, with the fans, but have a nice roomy, personal space, too. I loved those seats. More than any luxury box I’ve been in. I got to sit in them at the first Falcons game in MB because they had screwed up our season tickets (double booked our seats with someone else). I guess you could attach a bunch of led lights everywhere, because everyone seems to rave about that at MB. Maybe introduce some technology based entertainment with apps and WiFi. Set up big screens in the tailgating areas with college game day or other football games on if it’s a 3:30 or later game.

This is the direction of the future, imo. Attendance is down across all sports. You've got to provide a more complete experience
 
This is the direction of the future, imo. Attendance is down across all sports. You've got to provide a more complete experience

Yep. Hawks just came to this conclusion too. They said their research showed that most people aren't going to the games to watch the game, they're going for a nice night out. Which makes me sad as a sports fan, but I suppose it's the new reality
 
Duh.

UGA reports 100% attendance every game going back over 7-8 years. Their attendance is obviously very good but they've always had very visible patches of empty seats in their upper decks for cupcake games and for some of the more minor SEC games.

I think chair backs are definitely the way to go at BDS, for a lot of reasons. Even the optics are better when there are empty seats versus empty bleachers. The top 50% of the upper north would be a good spot for another video board and tarped signage that can be removed for UGA and Clemson visitor seating. Use the bottom half of the upper North for the Beer Garden. Those seats are seriously underrated for the field and skyline view.

I went to the GSU KSU game yesterday. GSU sells beer. That's just lost revenue for us.

On the plus and I haven't seen it talked about anywhere, Techwood Drive is going to be part of the Lower East Concourse to alleviate that cluster. Will be interesting to see how that works.
 
When people buy tickets but then watch the game on TV it's sort of a win/win, but I think it's still probably better to fill up the stadium. I wish there was an effective way to provide Boy's Clubs, Scouts, and active military with the unused tickets. Transportation and supervision might be the challenge, and might be a good community service project for some college clubs or fraternities.
 
This is the direction of the future, imo. Attendance is down across all sports. You've got to provide a more complete experience


College football used to have a more complete experience, it was a day long event and the tailgating was every bit as important as the game itself. But all schools, not just Tech, have been making things harder and more expensive to attend games, all while the competitive alternative keeps getting cheaper and more entertaining
 
College football used to have a more complete experience, it was a day long event and the tailgating was every bit as important as the game itself. But all schools, not just Tech, have been making things harder and more expensive to attend games, all while the competitive alternative keeps getting cheaper and more entertaining
My bothers and dad never attend the games anymore. Dad is getting too old, so watching it at home makes sense. But my brothers see it as more of just a hassle. And it is. Preparing a big tailgate takes a lot of prep. But I love it, and still do it for our big games. I’m talking tents, generators, TVs, grills, etc. tailgating. But for Alcorn, I’m tailgating at the gulch with Auburn friends, and Ubering it to Bobby Dodd, then back to MB for Auburn-Washington.
 
Blame the really good TVs and the fact that everything is televised now. I was stunned that up here in Virginia, even the Alcorn St. game is being shown on a regular channel.

Technology and television have made staying home almost as good as attending. And if people who pay for seats choose to stay home (I've had season tix since the 1980s but obviously can't attend many games from 600 miles away) then not sure its as big a problem as advertised.
 
Did the mention the TSA bullshit at the gates?

Did they mention the cheating being so bad (and undeniable) that only a handful of teams actually have a chance?

If college football wants to have a prayer of a chance of a future they have to gut the cheating.
 
Did the mention the TSA bullshit at the gates?

Did they mention the cheating being so bad (and undeniable) that only a handful of teams actually have a chance?

If college football wants to have a prayer of a chance of a future they have to gut the cheating.

Agree on the cheating. The academic mismatch is also a bit of a joke. Schools without the money and free rides won’t ever compete.
 
Did the mention the TSA bullshit at the gates?

Did they mention the cheating being so bad (and undeniable) that only a handful of teams actually have a chance?

If college football wants to have a prayer of a chance of a future they have to gut the cheating.

Curious, do you think ending what is now a charade and saying that players don't have to go to class while they are playing would be less of a turnoff? With a requirement that any players have a full scholarship waiting for them at the school after their playing careers are over.
 
It's not just the quality of 4K TV and multiple angles that makes TV more appealing – it's because they've made going to the games almost impossible except for the diehard fan. The constantly-shifting game times make it hard to plan a tailgate, invite friends, plan kids' events, attend family weddings, etc. The games can take place anytime from noon to eight or nine at night, so throw in the commute time both ways, and you've basically got to block out an entire day to attend a three hour event. I do that – but I sympathize that a lot of people find that too much to ask.

If they would just announce game times at the beginning of the season, people could plan for all this stuff, and it would be a lot easier to attend, have a tailgate, etc. That would still give TV plenty of opportunity to put appealing matchups on at the right times.

The decision to prioritize TV over the live game experience has been a case of boiling a frog. At first it seemed like an unequivocal positive to get more exposure. And more exposure meant more lucrative TV contracts, too. But now we're at a place where the primary experience is suffering in favor of a secondary one.

And our secondary's not very good this year to begin with.
 
Did they mention the cheating being so bad (and undeniable) that only a handful of teams actually have a chance?
College football has never been more competitive than it is now. Consider the ACC Wheel of Destiny, the years of .550 play we endured, the rise of long-time mediocrities like So Carolina, Ks St, Duke, not to mention the G5 and FCS teams that punch above their weight.

The only thing that's made is less competitive in the past decade is the Evil Genius named Nick Saban.

There's a saying about lawyers... "A small-town lawyer is more important than his client; a big-city lawyer is less important than his client." I offer a corollary: "In the NFL, the teams make the coaches; in college, the coaches make the teams."
 
Back
Top