680 calling CPJ policy hypocrital again

hdtvfan

hdtvfan

Dodd-Like
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,659
Chernoff must have really felt put down when CPJ tried to explain his policy about verbal commits and visits to other schools.

Chuck joining in but trying to explain some of the reasons. I think really that Chernoff is just going after CPJ because he felt butthurt earlier.:rolleyes:

Edit: Apologies for not checking spelling in the thread title-oh, well.
 
Last edited:
Dude, it's a constant chachfest of whiney bitchery when it comes to Chernoff and CPJ. Best to ignore it.
 
GT flunkout said:
Dude, it's a constant chachfest of whiney bitchery when it comes to Chernoff and CPJ. Best to ignore it.
Click to expand...

Cannot disagree, but cannot help feeling that he is doing this to discredit CPJ just before signing day, don't think he would do that to St. Richt.
 
hdtvfan said:
Chernoff must have really felt put down when CPJ tried to explain his policy about verbal commits and visits to other schools.
Click to expand...

Chernoff has become a giant dbag as he has become more popular. Ratings whore.
 
Funny since Richt did the same exact thing last year when a commit visited another school the weekend before signing day.
 
GTSurgery said:
Funny since Richt did the same exact thing last year when a commit visited another school the weekend before signing day.
Click to expand...

But it's okay if you have a chance to replace him with someone better.
 
glb said:
Chernoff has become a giant dbag as he has become more popular. Ratings whore.
Click to expand...

But he is accurate, the policy is hypocritical, if you are pretending to be a big time program. We don't have that goal. We want to be #3 in our division behind V PI, and Miami or Virginia.
 
Yukonwreck said:
But he is accurate, the policy is hypocritical, if you are pretending to be a big time program. We don't have that goal. We want to be #3 in our division behind V PI, and Miami or Virginia.
Click to expand...

Well ideally we would be #4, but UNC isn't cooperating.
 
Chuck Oliver is an SEC homer and Chernoff is a douche, who cares what they think about CPJ.
 
Yukonwreck said:
But he is accurate, the policy is hypocritical, if you are pretending to be a big time program. We don't have that goal. We want to be #3 in our division behind V PI, and Miami or Virginia.
Click to expand...

+1
 
Yukonwreck said:
But he is accurate, the policy is hypocritical, if you are pretending to be a big time program. We don't have that goal. We want to be #3 in our division behind V PI, and Miami or Virginia.
Click to expand...

Chernoff is a moron. There's nothing hypocritical about our policy. It's probably more up front and honest than most. Everyone targets each others commits (Tech included). We honor the spot of anyone committed to us, but if they start shopping around to replace us, we start shopping around to replace them. Their spot is no longer safe.
 
Yukonwreck said:
But he is accurate, the policy is hypocritical, if you are pretending to be a big time program. We don't have that goal. We want to be #3 in our division behind V PI, and Miami or Virginia.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that the policy is "if you're shopping, we're shopping." If a guy "commits" we'll honor the commitment 100% if he doesn't take other visits; if he does, we may accept another person. If he maintains communication with the staff and talks to them about it, then it's not as big a deal, but if the guy is radio silent we may pull the offer.

Can you explain your position to me? I don't see it as being hypocritical; it's a process that has to be managed where a lot of decisions have to be made without all of the information. Different coaches manage it differently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top