So according to you, every firing of every head coach is unjust.
Lol, are you really this dumb?
No, I just don't believe that W/L record is the "most . . . significant statistic in all of football," which is what you said.
If it was, undefeated teams would automatically win the national championship every year, regardless of who they played. The Heisman would go to a player on that undefeated team, regardless of whether someone else has better stats. You could predict who would win a game simply by looking at what team had the better record.
Winning and losing may be important to the bottom line, but it doesn't come close to being the most significant statistic. If it you were right, LSU would be the champion, not Bama (since they had won the first game).
The point I was making, which you apparently couldn't comprehend, is that all football statistics are relatively meaningless because there are too many variables. A passer rating reflects not only how good the QB is, but also playcalling, offensive scheme, offensive line, WRs, quality of opponent, opponent's scheme, weather, score and game situation (does the team need to air it out to come back, is it ahead by a lot and throwing short, safe passes?), etc. With 16 games a season, something as simple as a game in heavy wind or in the snow can have a big effect on a season's stats.
Compare it to sports with meaningful statistics - in basketball a shooting percentage is largely determined by the shooter and the person guarding him. A batter's average is largely determined by the batter's and pitcher's skill. Yes, there are variables there too like fielding and weather, etc. But those balance out over 162 games and 600 ABs. That's TEN TIMES the number of football games. That's why there are advanced statistics in baseball, like BABIP, xFIP, wOBA, wRC+, WAR, but not in football.
