Official Gameday GT v UNC Thread

[cincyjacket]

He tackled that dude chest to chest. WTF???!!!

 

[GruffyMcGuiness]

His arm was being held so it was keeping him upright. It was a straight up hit. BS.

 

[Clifflives10]

Jabari and Francis need to step up now

The dude can barely stand up. Seriously, does the guy have a thyroid issue?

 

[MEwreck02]

Yeah, that was an obvious call. There's pretty much no way to overturn that on replay.

It's the rule that's retarded. The refs are just doing what they're told and calling it.



There's nothing to overturn. There was really obvious helmet to helmet contact.

Yep. It won't be changed unless it costs the SEC a playoff spot


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[georgiatech22]

This game's about to get ugly in a real good way

 

[gtnc72]

Yeah, that was an obvious call. There's pretty much no way to overturn that on replay.

It's the rule that's retarded. The refs are just doing what they're told and calling it.



There's nothing to overturn. There was really obvious helmet to helmet contact.

Intentional targeting should be ejection. Incidental only a 15 yard penalty.

 

[HelluvaChemE]

Love the fans booing after every play. Reminds me of six years or so ago when the refs let the clock run while we were driving and went out of bounds. Fans booing, throwing stuff at the refs as they went in for the half. Great memory

 

[GTCrew4b]

Worst targeting call ever?

How is a QB defenseless?

How is leading with the face mask not how we want kids to tackle?

That was NOT close to the correct application of the rule.

 

[gtnc72]

His arm was being held so it was keeping him upright. It was a straight up hit. BS.

Holding, yes.

 

[MEwreck02]

Man. We miss our NFL WRs


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[andrew]

Intentional targeting should be ejection. Incidental only a 15 yard penalty.

I don't think this is correct. I've never heard of incidental targeting, or any type of targeting penalty that doesn't come with an ejection.

 

[georgiatech22]

Why do we play so much better when we're off the radar?

 

[bvlahh]

Mikell with the nice catch, but negated by Joe

 

[MEwreck02]

Intentional targeting should be ejection. Incidental only a 15 yard penalty.

They look for the helmet to helmet contact. Once you have that there is no going back


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[gtnc72]

#75 missed an assignment.

 

[MEwreck02]

öööö back to back flags


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[bvlahh]

Now we're shooting ourselves

 

[Clifflives10]

LMAOOOOOO!!!!! WHAT A GREAT SOUND BITE "YOU SUCK REF. GO back to north carolina!"

 

[jdubjacket]

Is this the same crew as the Duke game last year?

 

[gtnc72]

I don't think this is correct. I've never heard of incidental targeting, or any type of targeting penalty that doesn't come with an ejection.

You're correct. My point is that the rule should be - IMO - what I said. It is what you state now.