2020 Recruiting

JoeCakeEater

Dodd-Like
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Messages
14,179
He’s a 5.6 rated 3 stars now on rivals and ranked top 80 nationally at his position. I agree everyone missed the evaluation on him initially, but rivals has decided based on highlights and his offer list that he actually is a pretty good player.

There’s a lot of fuzzy logic that goes into these rankings. Take them with a grain of salt. I prefer to pay attention to offer lists over most else. That’s a good indicator of what the kid brings to the table.
 

Architorture23

If ur players know u luv them, then u already won.
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
28,924
He’s a 5.6 rated 3 stars now on rivals and ranked top 80 nationally at his position. I agree everyone missed the evaluation on him initially, but rivals has decided based on highlights and his offer list that he actually is a pretty good player.

There’s a lot of fuzzy logic that goes into these rankings. Take them with a grain of salt. I prefer to pay attention to offer lists over most else. That’s a good indicator of what the kid brings to the table.
Simply too many kids to accurately assess. Of course, the offers list comes from the kid himself so there is no way to determine its validity, either.

Rankings are decent in a large sample size over the long term. But there is a ton of variance when you get to individuals.
 
Top