dawgs as undercheivers

79tech

Jolly Good Fellow
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
1,540
I don't subscibe to ESPN + , however they have an article and the biggest under acheivers over the last 30 years in college football. I never doubted who would be #1 and it is - the dawgs. What a bunch of losers
 
Last edited:
I
I don't subscibe to ESPN + , however they have an article and the biggest under acheivers over the last 30 years in college football. I never doubted who would be #1 and it is - the dawgs. What a bunch of losers

I wonder how many dawgs would get the title of this thread correct?
 
Well, I’m no UGA fan, but they have outscored us 135-35 over the past 3 years. I’m glad they underachieved or it could have gotten ugly.

All that matters is 1 - 0
# of national champions since MS-DOS was invented

It's been 14,830 days since the dwags won the championship. If you go 14,830 before that, you get to Dunkirk, which is before the US joined WW2.
 
All that matters is 1 - 0
# of national champions since MS-DOS was invented

It's been 14,830 days since the dwags won the championship. If you go 14,830 before that, you get to Dunkirk, which is before the US joined WW2.
And thank the good Lord for 2nd and 26 and that stupid receiver who caught the ball to start the clock and end the game.
 
And thank the good Lord for 2nd and 26 and that stupid receiver who caught the ball to start the clock and end the game.
1628550650311.gif
 
Georgia is a perennial underachiever.
In other news, water is believed to be wet.

But, this year is always their year. Until it isn't. Each and every year.
 
Back
Top