A couple of good reads....

Do you think it's possible for UGA to seem any more weak? Rickt's attitude will filter down to the team. Only scared, weak programs whine about their schedule. I can't wait to watch UGAy fall on their face!
 
Do you think it's possible for UGA to seem any more weak? Rickt's attitude will filter down to the team. Only scared, weak programs whine about their schedule. I can't wait to watch UGAy fall on their face!

$20 says that Ugag's weaker than a senators' pitching arm offense from the spring game brought on the fear.
 
schedule.
Richt told reporter Marc Weiszer, who covers the Dawgs for this newspaper and others in the Morris chain, that he's "not thrilled" with Georgia's non-conference schedule this fall. The Bulldogs are one of only three teams from Bowl Championship Series conferences to play three non-league BCS opponents..


Aren't we one of the 3 with non league bcs teams?

Teams we face: MISS ST., Vanderbilt, UGAy


we have 3 teams could beat the best of the "Elites" in their conference, which makes it worst is that this conference is "ELITE"

So bulldawgs have nothing(why do they spell dog like that)
 
I skimmed over the second article with a big UGA alum client of mine sitting in my office. I printed the article off and gave it to him. He was not pleased, but oh well....it was worth it
 
If memory serves me correctly, Adam Van Brimmer was the Macon Teleraph writer who covered Tech until he was promoted to Columbia SC several years ago. Sounds like he still likes us!!
 
Let me get this straight....MR is complaining because UGAy is one of only 3 teams that play 3 BCS out of conference teams, and GA's opponents are tougher than the other 2 teams' opponents. However, GT is one of the 2, and their opponents are GA and 2 other SEC teams. In other words, MR is saying that playing UGAy and other SEC teams is easier than playing the non-SEC teams. There you have it, in paraphrasing MR's own words--the SEC is over-rated.
 
Let me get this straight....MR is complaining because UGAy is one of only 3 teams that play 3 BCS out of conference teams, and GA's opponents are tougher than the other 2 teams' opponents. However, GT is one of the 2, and their opponents are GA and 2 other SEC teams. In other words, MR is saying that playing UGAy and other SEC teams is easier than playing the non-SEC teams. There you have it, in paraphrasing MR's own words--the SEC is over-rated.

Clever move sir.
 
Let me get this straight....MR is complaining because UGAy is one of only 3 teams that play 3 BCS out of conference teams, and GA's opponents are tougher than the other 2 teams' opponents. However, GT is one of the 2, and their opponents are GA and 2 other SEC teams. In other words, MR is saying that playing UGAy and other SEC teams is easier than playing the non-SEC teams. There you have it, in paraphrasing MR's own words--the SEC is over-rated.

nice try, but false logic

allowing that Georgie's schedule is "tougher" than Tech's does not mean necessarily that Georgie's out of conference schedule is "tougher" than Tech's. Therefore, one cannot conclude from this that the SEC is not as "tough" as the non-SEC


in Techspeak,

if a + b = c
and x + y = z
and c > z
DOES NOT indicate that b > y
it could be true, but it is not a logical consequence
 
nice try, but false logic

allowing that Georgie's schedule is "tougher" than Tech's does not mean necessarily that Georgie's out of conference schedule is "tougher" than Tech's. Therefore, one cannot conclude from this that the SEC is not as "tough" as the non-SEC


in Techspeak,

if a + b = c
and x + y = z
and c > z
DOES NOT indicate that b > y
it could be true, but it is not a logical consequence

Bah humbug, who needs you and your so called "logic" and "mathematics"...
 
Back
Top