Birddog breaks down the Tech/UGA game

Well, in truth, you have to cover them, otherwise, what happen when you shift to make them eligible? I think the key is if you can force a team to cover guys that aren't eligible, and can make 'em pay.


Lining up over them is fine, and should be done, but the defence needs to realize he is covered and when he runs down the field in a pattern, you do not need to cover him. That was the mistake the UGAg CB did during that play. Use that CB on a blitz or something else instead of covering him in his pass route.
 
You have to cover them because they're a blocker, and if you don't then we have numbers to run the ball on the nearside. That's a silent presnap read that the offense makes to change the direction of the play.

Birddog's point is that if you're going to line a CB up on him, don't have the CB follow him out into the pattern (because he's not eligible) - have him blitz.
 
You have to cover them because they're a blocker, and if you don't then we have numbers to run the ball on the nearside. That's a silent presnap read that the offense makes to change the direction of the play.

Birddog's point is that if you're going to line a CB up on him, don't have the CB follow him out into the pattern (because he's not eligible) - have him blitz.

Precisely. The problem was not in the defensive alignment, it was in the execution. People are making it an alignment issue. It is not. Quite different from the case where the CB played our WR right into his block on the S. They have to change that into a zone coverage.

stinger78
...enjoying a more conciliatory tone
 
I'm almost a little worried about their fanbase if we beat the mutts again this year. Some of their little brains are just going to EXPLODE.
PJ the Div Iaa coach + a high school offense + losing two in a row to a school they claim is irrelevant + Pretty Boy not being able to summon the magical college football fairy to help them win = EXPLODE
 
Some of their little brains are just going to EXPLODE.

As will Richt's job security. If we can take it to 3 in a row, then not only will Richt get fired, nobody will want to come coach at UGA because of how they treated Richt, and because their job security would depend on regularly beating PJ.

We can DESTROY THEIR ENTIRE FOOTBALL PROGRAM with 2 more wins, becuase of the evil nature of their fans.
 
We may want to lighten up on dominating his blog with comments, seriously.

It may be quite some time before he writes about GT again due to the well-meaning flood of thanks that devolved into a pissing contest with dawgs.
 
I'm almost a little worried about their fanbase if we beat the mutts again this year. Some of their little brains are just going to EXPLODE.
PJ the Div Iaa coach + a high school offense + losing two in a row to a school they claim is irrelevant + Pretty Boy not being able to summon the magical college football fairy to help them win = EXPLODE

I noticed after last November that the delusion has moved from they "own" us (they won 7 IAR, despite 3 of the last 4 games being highly debatable last minute wins), to we have to have our anomaly, since they are so dominant in the series, and there is absolutely no way we can beat them again this fall.

It has moved from a "here's the historical fact," to "here's the future reality." Beating them, especially if we can lay a good whupping on them this fall, would destroy this mentality.
 
BTW, 2 blogs I read today also linked to this birddog blog post.

http://www.collegegameballs.com/2009/06/30/around-the-interwebs-49/

And then smart football did as well. http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-you-cant-just-play-assignment.html

Okay, so the safety ends up making the tackle on the pitch back, while the cornerback forced the pitch by taking on the quarterback. Johnson saw that, and on the very next play, called the same play to the other side, but with one important difference: the near slotback blocked the safety -- i.e. the guy responsible for the pitch back. So who now has the pitch back? Let's find out:


Answer: No one. That Paul Johnson, he's crafty. This is basically what happened when those Georgia Tech teams put it together last season and whupped up on teams. Indeed, his offense had a rather high degree of variance, considering that in some games against weak opponents it did little but in others, including against Miami and Georgia, the second half was defensive armageddon. I think the Miami game in particular was an example of a defense that had a plan for the flexbone going into the game, a decent one, but Johnson figured it out about halfway through and Miami lacked the ever important counter-to-his-counter. And once Johnson started messing with UM's defensive assignments, the defense got stretched out, and then plays like these happened:

I will have more to say about Johnson's flexbone before the season begins, including some thoughts on defending it.(Preview question: how do you deal with the flexbone's triple scheme -- which can easily outflank the defense to one side of the field -- with the flexbone's immediate pre-snap threat of four-verticals? Keep in mind that adding another defender to the box tends to force you into a single-safety defense, which is precisely what four verticals is designed for. More on this later.)

But for now, savor last season's mutlifarious brilliance of option football writ BCS. The flexbone-triple:



End note: As a final bonus, it appears the good people at EA Sports have added more passing to the flexbone. In the video below, the old run and shoot "choice" route is shown. (Ht EDSBS.)

I am interested in hearing how smartfootball is going to defend against CPJ. If you are not reading his blog, I highly recommend it.
 
BTW, 2 blogs I read today also linked to this birddog blog post.

http://www.collegegameballs.com/2009/06/30/around-the-interwebs-49/

And then smart football did as well. http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2009/06/why-you-cant-just-play-assignment.html



I am interested in hearing how smartfootball is going to defend against CPJ. If you are not reading his blog, I highly recommend it.
Smart football is probably the single best blog worth taking the time to read. I think there's going to be a lot of writing about Paul Johnson's offense next season.
 
Smart football is probably the single best blog worth taking the time to read. I think there's going to be a lot of writing about Paul Johnson's offense next season.

Especially if we are really strong offensively in our first 4 games.
 
UGA losing 2+ IAR to us makes me think of that Michael Jackson fan club president who committed suicide recently. Sometimes the pain is too much to bear.
 
OMFG


Mike's (birddog) post just now in the comments section of his blog has to be one of the funniest things I've ever read. Holy crap I can't stop laughing. Wow. Toooo funny.
 
Once we see a difference of our recruits on the line GT is going to win a national championship. YEAH I SAID IT!
 
Once we see a difference of our recruits on the line GT is going to win a national championship. YEAH I SAID IT!

I think we're already seeing it. Hell, I don't think I could be more impressed with what our coaches have done for recruiting this month but at this point I still might :D
 
Precisely. The problem was not in the defensive alignment, it was in the execution. People are making it an alignment issue. It is not. Quite different from the case where the CB played our WR right into his block on the S. They have to change that into a zone coverage.

stinger78
...enjoying a more conciliatory tone
Actually, once the "ineligible" slot starts running a route down field the play HAS to be a run, right? If we try a pass to an eligible receiver we still have the ineligible receiver down field. So if the defense is really paying attention they could, in this situation, let all receivers run their routes and commit totally to stopping the run. Or am I missing something?
 
Actually, once the "ineligible" slot starts running a route down field the play HAS to be a run, right? If we try a pass to an eligible receiver we still have the ineligible receiver down field. So if the defense is really paying attention they could, in this situation, let all receivers run their routes and commit totally to stopping the run. Or am I missing something?

Yes. That was the point on the ineligible receiver. Why cover him? He has to line up on him in case we uncover him. Bu the minute he crosses the LOS, it's got to be a run. It's an execution error, not a formation error. On the eligible WR being covered as he runs to the S to block, he as to be covered by someone, since if he's abandoned, he just breaks it off down field for the pass. They could cover him with a zone with the S on the pitch man, and have the CB watch for the run, too. I mean, if he's at the S and we throw it to him, presumably the S can make a play.
 
Yes. That was the point on the ineligible receiver. Why cover him? He has to line up on him in case we uncover him. Bu the minute he crosses the LOS, it's got to be a run. It's an execution error, not a formation error. On the eligible WR being covered as he runs to the S to block, he as to be covered by someone, since if he's abandoned, he just breaks it off down field for the pass. They could cover him with a zone with the S on the pitch man, and have the CB watch for the run, too. I mean, if he's at the S and we throw it to him, presumably the S can make a play.

Does it necessarily have to be a run? What it if was passed to the eligible receiver? Is that illegal?
 
Back
Top